GMAT Problem Solving Discussions

Total no.of 3-digit even numbers > 700 works to 149.So option 1 and 2 are ruled out.

first digit can take values - 7,8,9
Last digit can take values - 2,4,6,8
second digit can take values - 1-9 but when the first digit is 7 it can't take the value of 7 and it can't take the value of 2 when the last digit is 2.so the total no.of values the second digit can take is 7.

So total no.of combination works to 3*7*4 = 8

Am I missing any number?

3 digit integers greater than 700
1st place can be filled in 3 ways: 7, 8 or 9
2nd place can be filled in 9 ways: 1-9
3rd place can be filled in 9 ways: 1-9

Total possible numbers: 3*9*9=243
Answer is B.
What is the OA?


the question talks about EVEN integers...
Answer is E.
What is the OA?


dunno OA.. as mentioned with the question.. BTW I also got the same answer 😉
3 digit integers greater than 700
1st place can be filled in 3 ways: 7, 8 or 9
2nd place can be filled in 9 ways: 1-9
3rd place can be filled in 9 ways: 1-9

Total possible numbers: 3*9*9=243
Answer is B.
What is the OA?

How could I miss that? Answer will be C: 108, as 3rd place can be filled in 4 ways only as its and even integer.
srworld Says
My answer is C.


Share explanation.. if possible..
the first digit can take three values-7,8,9
the second digit can take 9 values-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
the third digit can take four values-2,4,6,8
so total combinations=3*9*4=108


The q states to have non-zero and distinct digits.Will the above calculation results in same digits as 772 or 788 etc?
Total no.of 3-digit even numbers > 700 works to 149.So option 1 and 2 are ruled out.

first digit can take values - 7,8,9
Last digit can take values - 2,4,6,8
second digit can take values - 1-9 but when the first digit is 7 it can't take the value of 7 and it can't take the value of 2 when the last digit is 2.so the total no.of values the second digit can take is 7.

So total no.of combination works to 3*7*4 = 8

Am I missing any number?


I think as per the ques, 744, 866, 888 etc are also invalid.. I think u forgot to cover those numbers..
Total no.of 3-digit even numbers > 700 works to 149.So option 1 and 2 are ruled out.

first digit can take values - 7,8,9
Last digit can take values - 2,4,6,8
second digit can take values - 1-9 but when the first digit is 7 it can't take the value of 7 and it can't take the value of 2 when the last digit is 2.so the total no.of values the second digit can take is 7.

So total no.of combination works to 3*7*4 = 8

Am I missing any number?


can yoou explain ur answer?
guy with guts Says
can yoou explain ur answer?


The q talks about distinct and non-zero digits of the even nos > 700.So the number of digits in the second place (hundredth place ) will be 7(should not include the digits in units and thousandth place) and not nine.So the total combination works to 84.
nuttyvarun Says
I think as per the ques, 744, 866, 888 etc are also invalid.. I think u forgot to cover those numbers..


The q states to have non-zero and distinct digits.So 744 can't be possible here..
deepakraam Says
The q talks about distinct and non-zero digits of the even nos > 700.So the number of digits in the second place (hundredth place ) will be 7(should not include the digits in units and thousandth place) and not nine.So the total combination works to 84.


I simply missed the distinct part.
when first digit is-7 then for different second digits the total number possible is
for digit1-4,2-3,3-4 and so on,total-27
similiarly for 9-27
and for 8-28
total=27+27+28=82
How many even, three digit integers greater than 700 with distinct, non- zero digits are there?
(A) 729
(B) 243
(C) 108
(D) 88
(E) 77

How to solve this in quick time.. ;)

Hi,

A number starting with 7 can have the following ways:
Units' place can be one from 2,4,6,8.
Ten's place can be from 1 to 9 minus numbers selected for the units place and hundered's place.
so total numbers starting with 7 will be 7.4 = 28.
A number starting with 8 can have the following ways:
Units' place can be one from 2,4,6.
Ten's place can be from 1 to 9 minus 1 selected for the units place and hundered's place.
so total numbers starting with 7 will be 7.3 = 21.

A number starting with 9 can have the following ways:
Units' place can be one from 2,4,6,8.
Ten's place can be from 1 to 9 minus 1 selected for the units place and hundered's place.
so total numbers starting with 7 will be 7.4 = 28.

So total numbers would be 28 + 21 + 28 = 77.
Hi,

A number starting with 7 can have the following ways:
Units' place can be one from 2,4,6,8.
Ten's place can be from 1 to 9 minus numbers selected for the units place and hundered's place.
so total numbers starting with 7 will be 7.4 = 28.
A number starting with 8 can have the following ways:
Units' place can be one from 2,4,6.
Ten's place can be from 1 to 9 minus 1 selected for the units place and hundered's place.
so total numbers starting with 7 will be 7.3 = 21.

A number starting with 9 can have the following ways:
Units' place can be one from 2,4,6,8.
Ten's place can be from 1 to 9 minus 1 selected for the units place and hundered's place.
so total numbers starting with 7 will be 7.4 = 28.

So total numbers would be 28 + 21 + 28 = 77.


right answer.i also worked on same line but miscalculated the numbers.
srworld Says
My answer is C.

3 blue, 2 red and 2 black stripes
Total arrangements: 7!
But the same color stripes are identical.
So possible arrangements: 7! / (3! 2! 2!) = 210
Answer C
How many even, three digit integers greater than 700 with distinct, non- zero digits are there?
(A) 729
(B) 243
(C) 108
(D) 88
(E) 77

How to solve this in quick time.. ;)


For 7XX --> 1*7*4 = 28
For 8XX --> 1*7*3 = 21
For 9XX --> 1*7*4 = 28
___
77 three digit nos poss ..Ans E ...
For 7XX --> 1*7*4 = 28
For 8XX --> 1*7*3 = 21
For 9XX --> 1*7*4 = 28
___
77 three digit nos poss ..Ans E ...


Bhavin as always.. succinct and prcise. thanks man!!

Running at their respective constant rates, machine X takes 2 days longer to produce w widgets than machine Y. At these rates, if the two machines together produce 5/4 w widgets in 3 days, how many days would it take machine X alone to produce 2w widgets?

A. 4
B. 6
C. 8
D. 10
E. 12

Running at their respective constant rates, machine X takes 2 days longer to produce w widgets than machine Y. At these rates, if the two machines together produce 5/4 w widgets in 3 days, how many days would it take machine X alone to produce 2w widgets?

A. 4
B. 6
C. 8
D. 10
E. 12

Let the two machine rates are x and y and let it takes machine y T days to produce W.
framing equations-
Ty=(T+2)x=W=>w=2xy/(x-y)------1
from second condition-3(x+y)=5/4W......2
solving the above two equations-we get
6x^2-5xy-6y^2=0,solving will give 2x=3y

substitute the value of y in eq-2,
x=w/4

hence if it takes t days to make 2w,tx=2w=t*w/4=2w=>t=8 days

:banghead:

The OA is not matching with my understanding of SD.. plz share your thoughts..

===

70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 105, 105, 130, 130, 130

the list shown consists of times, in seconds, that it took 10 schoolchildren to run a distance of 400 meters. if the standard deviation of the 10 running times is 22.4 seconds, rounded to the nearest tenth of a second, how many of the 10 running times are more than 1 standard deviation below the mean of the 10 running times?

answer choices:
a. 1
b. 2
c. 3
d. 4
e. 5

Sum of all the running times = 1000
Mean of the 10 running times = 100

1 SD = (100-22.4) to (100+22.4) = 77.6 to 122.4

Ques:
How many of the 10 running times are more than 1 standard deviation below the mean of the 10 running times

the answer must be below mean and more than the SD, i.e. between 77.6 and 100.
thus, 80 - 85 - 90 = the 3 running times that satisfy the ques..

answer must be option C. same as OA ;)

thanks all.. I did not get the question in one go.. had to re-read it to solve it..

:banghead:

The OA is not matching with my understanding of SD.. plz share your thoughts..

===

70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 105, 105, 130, 130, 130

the list shown consists of times, in seconds, that it took 10 schoolchildren to run a distance of 400 meters. if the standard deviation of the 10 running times is 22.4 seconds, rounded to the nearest tenth of a second, how many of the 10 running times are more than 1 standard deviation below the mean of the 10 running times?

answer choices:
a. 1
b. 2
c. 3
d. 4
e. 5