@dreamz007 said:Between 1940 and 1945 gasoline consumption in the US dropped about 35 % because of the war time rationing. In the same period, lung cancer in the US white males declined by approximately the same percentage. Between 1914 and 1950 lung cancer mortality increased nineteen fold and the rate of gasoline consumption increased at the same rate. Which of the following facts, if true would weaken the above arguments?A. For each of the years between 1939 and 1949, lung cancer among urban blacks in the US remained at the same rate.B. The amount oflead in gasoline increased between 1916 and 1944.C. After 1950 the gasoline consumption jumped.D. During world war II, people suffering from cancer were forbidden to drive.E. Women frrst began driving in large numbers between 1941 and 1951.
going by Bo's statement :- Bo cannot be thief, else both of Bo's statement will be true....Also Roman cannot be thief else wise both of Bo's statement will be false....SInce only one of Bo's statement is true, hence either of John or kate can only be thief.
Going by Kate statment that "It was bo" , this is false by above expalnation, hence his first statement must be true i.e. "It was John".
Keeping John as thief will also make one of the statement of both Roman and John true and other statement of them wrong....
Thus, John looks as thief....
Please respond whether its correct or not.
Can we all please follow a practice , when ever some one is posting a question make sure to number it with some initials of his name and number , may be something like If I am posting a question I will prefix a number DA1(initials of my username and one numeric number)
in that case people commenting on that question later will be able to track the answer.....PLease try and follow this practice for our good only
Hello people.
This might be a little off-topic but am panicking about my CR. Its been 10 days since I started practicing CR. I have read the MGMAT CR twice (including questions) and have tried the OG13, etc. But I am still getting an accuracy ranging from 50%- 100%. I suppose its because I do all correct when easier questions come. How do I go about improving my CR to about 90% and consistent? Ihave heard the usual advice from a lot many people but it does not seem to be working. Should I read the LSAT CR book thoroughly? Reply soon
Thanks
Digvijay
Thanks for your prompt response. Well I am convinced about 97% of them, the rest 3% i have marked as doubts and will ask them to my instructor.
Also another problem I think I have is that I don't stop after the paragraph to make assumptions. I cant stop from going to the options directly, I have this urge to finish before time.
Thank you so much for your effort.
I am facing somewhat similar problem, I am able to figure out the argument and conclusion and premises but in difficult question I falter at the last two options to chose from.
@EducationAisle CAN YOU SUGGEST ME SOME GUD CHALLENGING MATERIAL FOR CRITICAL REASONING, i have my thinking in line,but very less material with me so far as i was into CAT n all that stuff....
now i want to kickstart GMAT...
is there any smaller book than CR bible to read gmat theory ? please guide me with this.
Please can someone post the OA for this again!

