Q. In the effort to fire a Civil Service employee, his or her manager may have to spend up to $100,000 of tax money. Since Civil Service employees know how hard it is to fire them, they tend to loaf. This explains in large part why the government is so inefficient.
It can be properly inferred on the basis of the statements above that the author believes which of the following?
I. Too much job security can have a negative influence on workers.
II. More government workers should be fired.
III. Most government workers are Civil Service employees.
(A) I only
(B) I and III only
(C) II only
(D) I, II, and III
(E) III only
OA - A. My ans - B
First of all I doubt the validity of this question.CR Questions generally don't comes this format, at least I haven't seen any in OG.
Anyway, Everyone here is missing the big picture of this question. This is not a normal Inference type.
An inference question falls in must be true type questions - we are not allowed to assume anything from outside.
It acts in two ways -
1. one that can be directly proven from the statements at hand - at times they are just a paraphrase of what is already stated or very very close to the statement at hand. This is more common type of inferences.
My brother is taller than me
Inference : I am shorter than my brother.
Here the statements can be rigorously proved
2. The second type of inference cannot be rigorously proved - but at the same time it cannot be false . It would be ridiculous for them to be false.
Joe went to the room and picked 5 eclairs from a bowl of 100 candies containing 10 eclairs and 90 X.
Inference :
from rule 1 --- something that can be rigorously proved.
e,g : the bowl now contain 5 eclairs
from rule 2 ----- Joe deliberately picked 5 eclairs. this is true as this cannot be false, if its just by chance , i think you know the probability of picking 5 chocolates out of 100 and still getting all eclairs.
here why the author is mentioning the composition of the bowl -- its for a purpose. GMAT will never tell you something just like this, all statements are there for some reason. This is also a reason why GMAT passages never have a conclusion.
Wrong inference : Joe preferred/like eclairs --- this is too much far stretched, we dont know the reason for joe picking up this.
Here you have to know why the statements are being told to u - what are the facts doing there . When ever any facts are being told to you, its for a purpose. They are not simply written !! You have to find out why the statements are being told to you by the author.
Here the author believes something or wants to prove something and so he presents the fact in front of you. So why the author is trying to tell you all this facts - you have to find the reason.
I think by now you can find out why A is the only fit answer !! This is a very much tested concept in RC. This problem is based on this concept.
Hope this helps !!