hav u checked that 4 teams wala ques in lr??jisme semifinal final wagrh tha
usme solution me kha h h its clear ki c nd d played final match ?how cm i dont get it
one more thing how much percentile is needed for call from all the new iims including shillong and 6 others?? with good acads ..can i get a call on 92-95 percentile in cat with acads 90in 10th 89 in 12 8.3 cgpa in btech??
pplz dnt say do ur best ; i just dont want to mix up the things trying to score much ;i want to be in any of the iims or iit delhi mumbai..is this much percentile enuff
There were four teams each with at least 1 goal, 1, 2, 3, 4 Now the one with max goals didn't win. But he will be in finals for sure..
Now the one with 1 goal cannot be in finals, so he loses, so the other team scores more than 1
possible scores 2-1, 3-1, 4-1,
4-1 is not possible, as then the other match will end in 3-2, so no goals in the finals 2-1 is possible, means the other match has a team which loses with 3-2 or 4-2. 3-2 cannot be as then the final will end up iwth a 2-1 score. Not possible, Hence, 4-2.
Further analysis will tell the scores are
1-0 final 2-1 first semi 4-2 second semi!!
The one who wins final scores two goals in the semis!
Finally the scores of the last mock of the season are out... And the scores are just Amazing...some1 even managed to pull out a 169!!
i dont knw how he managed such a score...but in both cases he is a smartass!!
still i blive the champs of PG such as rooney,TNT,and ravi teja and SKS would have done wonders in this test...i heard one of them has got a score in the 160's...so puys u never knw sum1 among them cud have scored a 169..as they havnt posted their scores this tym!!
Still i would like to wish every pg member best f luck fr the D-DAy!!
dude!!! dn pay so much heed to this result...coz its definitely exxagerated...js compare it with PM 10 and raise ur percentiles a lil over dat...arnd .5-2...depending on how much hv u scored...draw inspiration out of the result rather wasting tym on thinking abt the cutoffs etc...if u emulate the same performance in CAT u will definitely get more den...95 ile...js keep ur cool...move on...BEST OF LUCK
Thanks a lot mate. After analyzing i realized the 4 mistakes I made in sec 1 ,at least 3 of them should not have been made in the 1st place. SO as u said if i take care of these mistakes and just take inspiration out of this, it will help me.
And as it is i have nothing to lose,I have to take admission at any cost this year. i wont let this deter me. Mocks cant decide where I head in my career :nono:
Anyways thanks a lot for your encouraging words.
And for once all the best to everyone.I am sure everyone will do very well on his/her day.
Shocked to see such a high cut-offs.. I think ppl are trying very hard in the last few days left... Okk, so here goes my okayish result..
QA/DI : 96.4(55)..could have done better here,made some silly mistakes VA/LR : 84.9(44)..although i m happy wid my VA score as last time i scored meager 25(PM10) which is easier then this one and was thinking of 90+ here but as usual ppl are blasting this sectn..
OA : 95.15(99)..actually last yr i got the same overall %ile
So,the mock season ends here,now the final mock(CAT) on 30th ATB puys...
Damn!! why are the cutoffs at 107. Was it because of the 10 k thing or the exam was really easy. I think I am missing something. Anyways just crossed cuttoff and in the toppers list, but really couldn't believe the cutoff. OA-108 with 97.33 sec1 58 sec2 50
Guys, it's sad that a good mock has been ruined by some dolts, I'm sad to be told that there was rampant cheating in this mock. The percentiles have been skewed, which is unfortunate, because I quite enjoyed this exam. I took it unproctored, and had to muddle Section 1 (was rushing to work), but liked what I saw.
Got a call from a friend, a VERY intelligent friend, who competes with me in CL mocks, who told me he'd seen the solutions before going into the exam. I refused to believe him. He showed me his exam analysis. The time spent upon his questions was fantastic. Looked like this: 0 0 1 1 0 0 9 1 etc.
Basically, he'd memorized the answers, the ones he forgot (mostly DI) he had to sit down and attempt, at leisure, taking monstrous amounts of time. I'm sure many people blitzed through Section 1. But not THAT fast! Not in 45 minutes, surely?
Stupid move by CL to declare that cash prize, and even dumber to declare solutions early (to be honest, though, you could have seen the question analyses on this thread even if the solutions weren't up. It's only our personal integrity that keeps us from peeking). Motivated some otherwise sincere gentlemen to sort of screw the mock for the rest of us. That said, it was high-scoring, for whatever my opinion's worth.
Sorry for the diatribe, but it's 1am and I'm annoyed by that phone call 😞 Keep the peace Sid
Guys, it's sad that a good mock has been ruined by some dolts, I'm sad to be told that there was rampant cheating in this mock. The percentiles have been skewed, which is unfortunate, because I quite enjoyed ...........
Keep the peace Sid
what about those of us who honestly attempted this mock ? I mean i scored 95 in this mock which is my highest of the season ........ I didnt cheat or anything ..... so do you mean that those who didn't cheat actually have higher %ile than what they got ?
what about those of us who honestly attempted this mock ? I mean i scored 95 in this mock which is my highest of the season ........ I didnt cheat or anything ..... so do you mean that those who didn't cheat actually have higher %ile than what they got ?
no dude its like those who have attempted it genuinely,their percentiles have came out to be lesser than wat they should have been if everyone attempted it fairly so watever percentile u have got,u can like add 1-2 to it
Can any tell for qa question no. 1 , suppose the non parallel lines dont intersect each other but cut parallel lines only , then point of intersections can be 4 also....
Can any tell for qa question no. 1 , suppose the non parallel lines dont intersect each other but cut parallel lines only , then point of intersections can be 4 also....
the question says specifically that only 2 are parallel so you cannot consider that case...
