CAT Preparation 2017- PaGaLGuY

894 Posts  ·  16,428 Users
About this group

Join the discussion on CAT 2017 Preparation and Get more Information About How To Prepare For CAT, Also Get Details About CAT Syllabus and CAT Exam From our MBA Section and Much More..

Page 1 of 90

Hola CAT aspirants, hope your health is good.

I have got well-researched and exhaustive CAT course material and arranged right resources for you guys with lot of relevant practice questions, just available at nominal price. Both CAT 2020 and CAT 2021 packages available !

Ping for more details: 

https://wa.link/1b4em0 

ShubhiDon
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

Hello everyone. Pinnacle MBA is an experiential management course which is most in-demand right now considering the fast-paced technological world. JK Lakshmipat University is offering Pinnacle MBA which is India's one of the best experiential management program.

You should definitely have a look at once and explore the course for yourself

https://www.jklu.edu.in/course/pinnacle-mba/

Post 82786619778055
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

 Hey there! I am looking for TIME and IMS basic test series for CAT 2020. If you are someone who had bought it and dont need it anymore, please get in touch.  

1 like
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

Hello everyone. Pinnacle MBA is an experiential management course which is most in-demand right now considering the fast-paced technological world. JK Lakshmipat University is offering Pinnacle MBA which is India's one of the best experiential management program.

You should definitely have a look at once and explore the course for yourself

https://www.jklu.edu.in/course/pinnacle-mba/

Post 82564747969246
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

 Selling CAT and OMET study materials in KOLKATA . It includes-
TIME materials for the past 2 years
AIMCAT papers
Class Work sheets
Interested candidates Whatsapp at 8584043200  for more details.   

undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

An important article for boosting your CAT prep by an IIM-C alumnus:


https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cat-preparation-shahrukh-moin-khan/

1 like
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

 

Anyone interested to purchase TIME Study Material?

Available:

Booklets: Set A, B and C

Hand Out Sheets: VA, LR, DI and QA

Hand Out Solution Booklets: All

GD/PI/WAT: Supporting booklets.

DM ASAP.

undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

For more information please visit wizyowl.com New course of marketing management is going to be uploaded soon  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5rzgB81K_0&t=17s 

Post 46377664795001
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

 

 If translated into English, most of the ways economists talk among themselves would sound plausible enough to poets, journalists, businesspeople, and other thoughtful though noneconomical folk. Like serious talk anywhere-among boat designers and baseball fans, say -the talk is hard to follow when one has not made a habit of listening to it for a while. The culture of the conversation makes the words arcane. But the people in the unfamiliar conversation are not Martians. Underneath it all (the economist's favorite phrase) conversational habits are similar. Economics uses mathematical models and statistical tests and market arguments, all of which look alien to the literary eye. But looked at closely they are not so alien. They may be seen as figures of speech- metaphors, analogies, and appeals to authority. Figures of speech are not mere frills. They think for us. Someone who thinks of a market as an “invisible hand” and the organization of work as a “production function” and his coefficients as being “significant,” as an economist does, is giving the language a lot of responsibility. It seems a good idea to look hard at his language. If the economic conversation were found to depend a lot on its verbal forms, this would not mean that economics would be not a science, or just a matter of opinion, or some sort of confidence game. Good poets, though not scientists, are serious thinkers about symbols; good historians, though not scientists, are serious thinkers about data. Good scientists also use language. What is more (though it remains to be shown) they use the cunning of language, without particularly meaning to. The language used is a social object, and using language is a social act. It requires cunning (or, if you prefer, consideration), attention to the other minds present when one speaks. The paying of attention to one's audience is called “rhetoric,” a word that I later exercise hard. One uses rhetoric, of course, to warn of a fire in a theatre or to arouse the xenophobia of the electorate. This sort of yelling is the vulgar meaning of the word, like the president's “heated rhetoric” in a press conference or the “mere rhetoric” to which our enemies stoop. Since the Greek flame was lit, though, the word has been used also in a broader and more amiable sense, to mean the study of all the ways of accomplishing things with language inciting a mob to lynch the accused, to be sure, but also persuading readers of a novel that its characters breathe, or bringing scholars to accept the better argument and reject the worse. The question is whether the scholar- who usually fancies himself an announcer of “results” or a stater of “conclusions” free of rhetoric -speaks rhetorically. Does he try to persuade? It would seem so. Language, I just said, is not a solitary accomplishment. The scholar doesn‟t speak into the void, or to himself. He speaks to a community of voices. He desires to be heeded, praised, published, imitated, honored, en-nobeled. These are the desires. The devices of language are the means. Rhetoric is the proportioning of means to desires in speech. Rhetoric is an economics of language, the study of how scarce means are allocated to the insatiable desires of people to be heard. It seems on the face of it, a reasonable hypothesis that economists are like other people in being talkers, who desire listeners that they go to the library or the laboratory as much as when they go to the office on the polls. The purpose here is to see if this is true, and to see if it is useful to study the rhetoric of economic scholarship. The subject is scholarship. It is not the economy, or the adequacy of economic theory as a description of the economy, or even mainly the economist‟s role in the economy. The subject is the conversation economists have among themselves, for purposes of persuading each other that the interest elasticity of demand for investment is zero or that the money supply is controlled by the Federal Reserve. Unfortunately, though, the conclusions are of more than academic interest. The conversations of classicists or of astronomers rarely affect the lives of other people. Those of economists do so on a large scale. A well known joke describes a May Day parade through Red Square with the usual mass of soldiers, guided missiles, rocket launchers. At last come rank upon rank of people in gray business suits. A bystander asks, “Who are  those?” “Aha!” comes the reply, “those are economists: you have no idea what damage they can do!” Their conversations, do it. 

 21. Based on your understanding of the passage, which of the following conclusions would you agree with:

 

1: The geocentric and the heliocentric views of the solar system are equally tenable.
(2) The heliocentric view is superior because of better rhetoric.
(3) Both views use rhetoric to persuade.
(4) Scientists should not use rhetoric
3 answers
You can view the comments after answering or skipping this question.

Hello Guys Anyone want Endeavour,CL materials less than Half rate than DM me as i am done with CAT..

undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...