Basic formula's and concepts of VA/LR/DI/QA

6 Posts  ·  61 Users
About this group

Since getting the basics right is the most important thing in CAT prep, We can discuss and revise them through this thread.

Page 1 of 1

     Divisibilty Methods     For checking divisibility by any 'prime/odd' number except for factors of 5', you have the concept of base number.
 

Number Add Base Number Subtract Base Number
---------------------------------
3: 1 2
7: 5 2
9: 1 8
11: 10 1
13: 4 9
17: 12 5
19: 2 17
21: 19 2
23: 7 ?
27: ? 8
29: 3 ?
...
...
And so on....(i'll describe a method to get these below)
 

Now for checking divisibility either add the last digit*add base number to the number "formed by removing last digit" or you can subract last digit*subtract base number from the "formed by removing last digit"
 

for e.g.  check for 51/17 either 5- 1*5 =0 or 5 + 1*12 =17 hence divisible.
to check 312/13 we can 31+2*4 =39 hence dvisible or we can 31-2*9 = 13 ence divisible.
to check 61731/19 = 6173 + 1*2 = 6175 = 617 + 5*2 = 627 = 62 + 7*2 = 76 hence divisible.
to check 357976/29 = 35797 + 6*3 = 35815 = 3581 +5*3 = 3596 = 359 + 6*3 = 377 = 37 + 7*3 = 58 hence divisible..
to check 382294/11 = 38229-4*1 =38225 = 3822-5 = 3817 = 381 - 7 = 374 = 37 -4 =33 Hence divisible..
 

The Subract base Number for a number can be obtained as the {(samllest multiple of number which ends in one)-1}/10
i.e. for 3 or 7 it is (21-1)/10 =2
for 13 it is 91-1/10 = 9.
 

The AddbaseNumber for a number can be obtained as the {(samllest multiple of number which ends in nine)+1}/10
i.e. for 13 it is (39+1)/10 =4.
for 7 it is 49+1/10 = 5
 

Proof:
For SubtactBaseNumber say the number abcde...
I want to check divisibility by 17 where subtractbasenumber is 5
 

I can always write abcde... as 10X+Y (where Y is last digit and X is number formed by removing last digit)
 

Now X-Y*5 = (10X -50Y)/10 = (10X + Y -51Y)/10 = (OriginalNumber - 51 Y ) / 10
 

The number '51 Y' is a multiple of 17 so if "OriginalNumber" is divisible by 17 then "OriginalNumber - 51*Y" got to be.. i.e. "10X - 50Y"
as 10 and 17 are co-prime if "10X- 50Y" is divisible the "X-5Y" got to be.....
 

same theory hold's for addbasenumbers too....
 

This also defines why it is so easy to check divisibility by 3 or 9 just keep on adding the digits...
 

And you can check divisibility by 11 just by keeping on subrating digits form previous number.. (which is same as taking sum of even/odd location separately..)     Divisibility by 7
Only for those interested in Number theory (Not a Cat short-cut)
 

say the number is :
38,391,787
 

Separate into pairs of digits
38 39 17 87
 

Consider the difference between each pair of digits and the nearest multiple of seven, beginning for the first pair at right, lower (upper) for the first, upper (lower) for the second and so on, alternating for each new pair.
 

4 -----4 (21-17)
38 39 17 87
---4 ------3 (87-84)
 

The resulting digits, read from right are 3444 (which is also a number multiple of 7).
Proceed in the same way with 3,444
 

1
34 44
----2
 

The final pair 21 is a multiple of seven, so is the original number 38,391,787.
 

ANOTHER EXAMPLE
Look how fast this method is.
Consider the 15-digit number 531,898,839,909,822
2 ----2--- 3 ----0
5 31 89 88 39 90 98 22
---3 ---4 ----6 ----1
 

Now we have 10,634,232
4 -----0
10 63 42 32
----0 ----4
 

And now 4,004
 

2
40 04
---4
 

Which gives 42, a multiple of 7.
We only need three steps for a 15-digit number.   This is called TOJA's method of divisibility. Incidentally this also works for 11 and 13. Just a little manupulation is required, (in case you get a remainder of more than 9)
 

Let A = 5,962
7
59 62  77 which is a multiple of 1
--7
 

EXAMPLE 2
Let A = 5, 971,845
 

6---- 4
5 97 18 45 
--9 ----1
 

8
14 96 -> 88 ->divisible
----8
 

EXAMPLE 3
Let A = 80,714,546
 

8 ----10
80 71 45 46
----5-------2
 

The resulting numbers ( 2 10 5 8 ) don’t form a decimal number, so proceed in this way: Put the exceeding number 1 from 10, below the 2 and sum.
 

2 0 5 8 -> 3 0 5 8
1
 

3
30 58  33
---3

    3     ......https://www.facebook.com/groups/632112500304610/?ref=bookmarks

Impossible is nothing
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

          Could   The English verb "could" is used as both an auxiliary verb and a modal verb.   When using as a model verb or an auxiliary verb the verb "could" stays in its base form. Could doesn't change form according to the subject. Could is followed by a main verb. The main verb also stays in its base form. (The main verb that is used with could doesn't change form according to the subject.) Generally, we use could to:  

  • talk about past possibility      or ability 
  • make requests

'Could' can be used to talk about the past, the present or the future. Most modal verbs behave quite irregularly in the past and the future. Study the chart below to learn how "could" behaves in different contexts.     Modal   Use    Positive   Forms
  1. = Present   2. = Past   3. = Future   Negative   Forms
  1. = Present   2. = Past   3. = Future   You   can also use:      could   
possibility    1.   John could be the one who stole the money.  2. John could   have been the one who stole the money.  3. John could   go to jail for stealing the money.     1.   Mary couldn't be the one who stole the money.  2. Mary   couldn't have been the one who stole the money.  3. Mary   couldn't possibly go to jail for the crime.    might,   
  may      could   
conditional
of can    1.   If I had more time, I could travel around the world.  2. If I had had   more time, I could have traveled around the world.  3. If I had   more time this winter, I could travel around the world.    1.   Even if I had more time, I couldn't travel around the world.  2. Even if I   had had more time, I couldn't have traveled around the world.  3. Even if I   had more time this winter, I couldn't travel around the world.          could   
suggestion    1.   NO PRESENT FORM  2. You could   have spent your vacation in Hawaii.    3. You could   spend your vacation in Hawaii.       NO   NEGATIVE FORMS          could   
past ability    I   could run ten miles in my twenties.  I could speak   Chinese when I was a kid.  "Could" cannot be used in   positive sentences in which you describe a momentary or one-time ability. Yesterday, I   could lift the couch by myself. Not Correct    I   couldn't run more than a mile in my twenties.  I couldn't   speak Swahili.  "Could" can be used in   negative sentences in which you describe a momentary or one-time ability. Yesterday, I   couldn't lift the couch by myself. Correct    be   able to      could   
polite request    Could   I have something to drink?  Could I borrow   your stapler?  Requests usually refer to the near   future.   Couldn't   he come with us?  Couldn't you   help me with this for just a second?  Requests usually refer to the near   future.   can,   
  may,
  might          REMEMBER:   "Could not" vs. "Might not"
  "Could not" suggests that it is impossible for something to happen.   "Might not" suggests you do not know if something happens.  Examples: · Jack might not have the   key. Maybe he does not have the key.  · Jack could not have the   key. It is impossible that he has the key.     

   ���3�    https://www.facebook.com/groups/632112500304610/?ref=bookmarks

Impossible is nothing
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

Regarded to be 

considered as.


Correct or not?

Dint come this far, to come only this far.
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

when p happens, q happens..valid logical deduction is??

Dint come this far, to come only this far.
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

An odd function is symmetrical about?


X-Axis

Y-Axis

Origin

Dint come this far, to come only this far.
2 likes1 comment
Ankitsingh29
@Ankitsingh29  ·  754 karma

Sin x is odd function and it is symmetric about origin.

Like  ·  Reply  ·  
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...

Different formula's for calculating area of a triangle??

Dint come this far, to come only this far.
3 comments
Load more comments  ·  2 of 3
jyoti_chadha
@jyoti_chadha  ·  200 karma

@Ankitsingh29 Saare yaad karne zaroori hain ?

Like  ·  Reply  ·  
Ankitsingh29
@Ankitsingh29  ·  754 karma

It would be good if you do so. Though questions can be done without them but knowing these will save alot of time.

Like  ·  Reply  ·  
undefined
Write a comment
Write a comment...