Login
Advertisements
Advertisements
vinnuofvit's posts
vinnuofvit replied to Aimcat- 1105 scores, polls, discussions[ do not...
28c, 9w = 75
1 1
vinnuofvit replied to [AIM-CAT 1107] Scores ,Polls & Discussion (DO N...
hey thanks, Abhi.. this makes it much easier! :)
btw, is it the fermat's little theorem? where the denom shd be prime.
can u pls clarify how rem of n^10 / 22 = 1?
thanks much,
Vinod
vinnuofvit replied to [AIM-CAT 1107] Scores ,Polls & Discussion (DO N...
Hi puys.. Can u suggest any quicker way to solve q.31, than the given soln?
31. What is the remainder of (2^469 + 3^268 ) when divided by 22?
vinnuofvit replied to [AIM-CAT 1107] Scores ,Polls & Discussion (DO N...
Yes.. it's a general understanding that whichever side is longer, it's called length.
2 2
vinnuofvit replied to [AIM-CAT 1107] Scores ,Polls & Discussion (DO N...
Found this mock a little tricky.
appeared easy. but ended up with many wrongs
19c, 11w - OA 65
vinnuofvit replied to Reading speed - Tips and more..
2:45 mins - 185 wpm
vinnuofvit replied to Reading speed - Tips and more..
It took me 3:19 min.. with 80% recall.
i.e. 133 wpm :(
a medium tough passage i can say.. but felt when u get the real point of the passage, u can skim thro' the 2nd half.
vinnuofvit replied to [AIM-CAT 1108] Scores ,Polls & Discussion (DO N...
Attem -39
C - 24
W - 15 !!!
OA - 57
bad score.. can't figure out how so many wrongs.. maybe verbal was tricky where I attempted lot many.
DI was average.
couldn't complete QA as i had already lost much time tempted by verbal n DI, and due to over-confidence that i'm good at QA....
1 1
vinnuofvit replied to [AIM-CAT 1109] Scores ,Polls & Discussion (DO N...
yep.. DI n QA had a lot of sitters. so, cutoff is going to be higher.
Well, today i realized how important it is keep your cool during the exam.
i was restless, n that cost me a lot of time n accuracy in each of the sets!
2 2
vinnuofvit replied to [AIM-CAT 1110] Scores ,Polls & Discussion (DO N...
Well, at our test center, mine was the 7 am slot today, and for all the guys, the test started without asking for a code! (just like the uninvigil. one)
hope it was fixed later..