Gochyaa !!!!!
Here is the trap. We memorize the new and old, rare words, words for particular situations, words difficult to pronounce. But how often do we dissect the simple words to a discerning level.
What I mean is, CAT is an aptitude test where they will test you the familiarity of a word among different words. They will try to see if u have the ability to select the right word for the usage, just like a businessman who have to choose right field , right direction, right employee for the right job among many candidates or alternatives just like an good enterprenure .
The point is even if you don't know the exact meaning of word you should look to passage and try to infer its meaning by logical argument and reasoning. even if u have to become socrate or plato for that matter then be one.
The question I gave had many words with similar meanings that some of you might have got confused, but those who either know the exact meaning, or someone with good usage of words can easily tackle the question.
But what happens to those who know the meaning but are not sure of its exact meaning and its usage.
If you belong to this category ( as most of us do belong to at some or other question) then here is the remedy
Read the para as if u ar a member from Scotland yard, start thinking analytically and you will get the answer
This leads to another question that sometimes we have many arguments favouring different options and it becomes all too difficult to select the right one and in the mean time our mind splits into many parts and each one starts a GD giving their own argument when in fact we still have a far distance to go for GD.
Answer to this annoying and time consuming problem are many.
practise so much that you encounter lesser of this types
even if you encounter with one in exam after all the hard work ( not at exam center but before exam) , then its better to leave the question as early as possible since it will be a waste of time.
only adept at making quick decisions
Meanwhile answer to questions are
1 annoyed
2 dejectedly
and logical argument for the 1st one is ---- she became disgruntled ( u can answer now if u know the word correctly}
if not ,then u can ans from this ----- she defiantly left Poland and in 1891 entered the Sorbonne ---- this means she was not hopeless, not too depressed ( as she had not gone into shell) and certainly not worried ( as nothing in para shows that she was worried) but was annoyed with the university .
for 2nd
cuz as nothing in the para shows she was Worried ( worried about what -- jo hona thaa wo toh ho gaya ,abb kis baat key liye worry
Tearfully ---- arrey bhai ro rahi hai kya ye?
d Happily ---- koi pagal ya muderer hee kush hoyegaa
e Sorrowfully -- little confusing but u have to rely on knowledge here.
