Searching for results...
 
  • Home
  • News
  • Forums
    • CAT & related B-schools
    • XAT, SNAP, IIFT, MAT, CMAT   and related B-schools
    • CAT: Quant Prep
    • CAT: Verbal Prep
    • CAT: GK & other resources
    • GMAT & GRE prep
    • GMAT accepting B-schools
    • Jobs & Careers
    • Pre-MBA Jobs
    • Post-MBA Jobs
    • Chit-Chat
    • PG-Meets & Events
    • Life @ B-schools
    • Touching Lives
  • Apps
    • Townhall
    • Badges
    • Birthdays
    • Books
  • Rankings
 

Messages

Send a New Message
View All

Notifications

View All

Karma Updates

View All
    Live Ticker
    Login
    • Forgot password?

    New to PaGaLGuY?

    Login ×

    Sign In

    Forgot password?

    New to PaGaLGuY? Sign Up!

    Forgot your password? ×

    Advertisements
    Advertisements
    anupam.arora05

    0 Followers 0 Following 0 Pings 2 Posts 0 Karma Score
    anupam.arora05's posts
    anupam.arora05 replied to GMAT Sentence Correction Discussions
    anupam.arora05
    15 May '09
    What is parralelism.....
    can anyone answer plz....
    anupam.arora05
    03:50 PM, 15 May '09
    GMAT Sentence Correction Discussions
    • Report
    15 May '09
    These questions are from the OG 10. These are the OA with official explanations:

    1) A

    Choice A, the best answer, preserves grammatical parallelism while allowing for logical expression of temporal
    relationships; A employs the parallel participial phrases
    spawned... and extending ... to modify filigree. Other
    choices present different grammatical constructions that are not participial modifiers and thus not parallel to
    spawned: extends in B is a present-tense verb; it extended in D begins a new clause; and is extending in E
    ungrammatically introduces a new predicate. In C,
    extended is nonparallel if it is assumed to be a past tense
    195
    verb form; if it is assumed to be a past participle, it illogically states, as does D, that the filigree extended only in
    the past.


    2) B

    At issue is the need for logical and formal parallelism in a coordinate series. B, the best choice, clearly and
    correctly uses parallel noun phrases to list three effects of a drop in oil prices:
    a lowering of..., a rally in ..., and
    a weakening of....
    In place of the correct lower before/ears, choice A uses an incorrect participial adjective,
    lowering, that could cause confusion by seeming at first to function as a verb. A also violates parallelism. In C
    and D, the use of
    along with confuses meaning by making fears about inflation an independent effect, not an
    object of
    lowering. D and E violate parallelism by substituting an awkward gerund clause for the first noun
    phrase.


    3) C

    A correct sentence must maintain parallel structure. In choice A, the three-part series (to diagnose ...,
    deciding,
    ... or other purposes ...) lacks parallelism. C, the best choice, replaces A's third element with/or such
    purposes as;
    this phrase functions as a stem for the other two elements, which are recast as two parallel
    phrases--
    diagnosing ... or deciding .... Thus, choice C not only manages the parallel structure but avoids the
    less effective
    other purposes such as these at the end of choice A. Choice E uses faulty parallel structure (to
    be used..., deciding ..., or the like).
    In B and D, which and the use of which introduce sentence elements that
    lack antecedents or reference. In addition, D is wordy.

    What is parralelism.....

    can anyone answer plz....
    • Like 0
    • Share 0
    • Quote & Reply
    • Follow
      • B I U
        Press Shift+Enter to add a new line.

      anupam.arora05 replied to Introduce yourself
      anupam.arora05
      15 May '09
      Hello All!
      I am working in software....with 3 years of experience
      Enough of coding.....now want to do MBA.
      given CAT once.
      also given CET Maharashtra......
      Hope to learn a lot from Pagalguy...
      cheers
      Anupam
      anupam.arora05
      01:13 PM, 15 May '09
      Introduce yourself
      • Report
      15 May '09
      Hello All!

      I am working in software....with 3 years of experience

      Enough of coding.....now want to do MBA.

      given CAT once.

      also given CET Maharashtra......

      Hope to learn a lot from Pagalguy...

      cheers
      Anupam
      • Like 0
      • Share 0
      • Quote & Reply
      • Follow
        • Comments on this post have been disabled.
        Fetching more content ...
        That's the end of the page.
        • © 2013 PaGaLGuY
        • About Us
        • Careers
        • Advertise
        • Contact Us
        • Help
        • Privacy
        Report This Content ×

        Your report does not guarantee removal of this content from the site. It will be removed altogether only if a Moderator finds it especially useless after reviewing it.

        Warn User

        ×

        Repeal a Warning

        ×

        Promote this post

        ×
        web03:8028