Garima11's posts
Garima11
replied to NMAT 2012-Relevant Questions Discussion
Yeah thats fine but my query was how are we getting 3rd one in conclusio fragance has been made distrbuted while in statemets it is not. Isn't it so that we can make distributive i coclusion only if it is in statements?? If we do it by rules we wont be getting 3rd one?? kindly clarify
But you...
But you...
Garima11
replied to NMAT 2012-Relevant Questions Discussion
Some flowers are buds. All buds are petals.
No petal is pollen. All pollen is fragrance.
Conclusions : I. No bud is pollen.
II. No flower is fragrance.
III. No petal is fragrance.
(1) Only I follows (2) Only I and III follow (3) Only II and III follow
(4) None follows (5) None o...
No petal is pollen. All pollen is fragrance.
Conclusions : I. No bud is pollen.
II. No flower is fragrance.
III. No petal is fragrance.
(1) Only I follows (2) Only I and III follow (3) Only II and III follow
(4) None follows (5) None o...