India's latent entrepreneurship potential lies untapped because of life skills that aren't taught and social expectations that aren't set right. By addressing these problems in India's bright youngsters through their curriculums, b-schools could lay the seed for innovative businesses that scale to become billion dollar companies, says Vijay Anand, Head of IIT Madras's Incubation Center and Founder of popular startup event 'Proto.in'.
Lets face it: Throughout the world, and even in the Silicon Valley, MBAs carry a negative connotation when associated with startups. Venture capitalist Guy Kawasaki --- known for his book 'The Art of the Start', goes out to say that there are two categories of people that startups need to avoid --- first the consultants, and secondly the MBAs.
But my opinion of the cadre is not so bleak. Nor is the world so black and white. But there are avenues for change, and a need for an ambience in b-schools that could nurture the entrepreneurial spirit that seems to be getting India adrenalized.
Let's look around and understand the context: Saying that there is a lot going on in India would be an understatement. The elephant that is our country, with its billion voices, opinions and aspirations has started to move, and even jiggle a dance move or two, and that is leading to a rush of entrepreneurial opportunities for those who have the eye to spot it, the will to build a business and the ability to mobilize resources to turn that dream into reality. If some of these are skills that one can learn as a result of being in an environment, then how can b-schools impart them into their students, is the question.
1. The need to groom starters
If building an enterprise has to find an analogy, it would be in a relay race. B-schools have traditionally groomed people who can enter into an enterprise after the models have emerged, and can take it to scale thereafter. In our analogy, they'd be the 'sprinters'. India is a country bubbling with opportunities, needs and wants where one needs initiative to build that zygote of a billion dollar idea. Most MBA graduates aren't equipped to handle that. It's an oversight, if the MBAs of today are not able to participate in the tremendous avenues to build value from scratch but are bystanders and spectators. We desperately need sprinters who are agile, can spot the right timing and can adapt. That'd be the cornerstone of my argument for change.
2. You are the product. Build real value
Gone are the days when one will pledge loyalty to a company for a lifetime. These days, employments are just stages that one goes through to get to the final goal of achieving and honing one's skills --- hopefully not towards a pay cheque alone, but in being the best that one can be at something. If that is the case, then instead of business plan competitions --- where everything is dreamt up in vacuum, it makes a lot more sense for b-schools to actively engage the startup and SME communities and let students get a hands-on experience of building value in terms of the offering of the company and not just manipulate Excel values.
3. Understanding the value of money
As a society, I sometimes wonder if we teach the next generation the actual value of money. Colleges are phases in an individual's life during which they turn to become the biggest consumers of entertainment and lifestyle, rather than producers or creative individuals, thanks to the support of the parents. The greatest opportunity loss for a nation is the time a student spends in university shielded from financial burdens. Young students are in the prime of mental and creative form, but haven't found an avenue nor the inspiration to put it to use.
4.The ability to mobilize resources
Walk into any college or university and the best example of entrepreneurship is the way they run the college events --- if it's not funded by the college. Brands are created, values are defined, money is raised on the promise of service and quality and a team comes together to pull the whole event off. It's not surprising then to hear that time and time again, employers prefer to hire students who have spearheaded large scale events while in college and learned skills required to mobilize people, money and resources. How do you merge these skills to become part of the curriculum, where one learns how to analyze resources in hand, where one needs to be, and can draw the path to achieve the projected outcome?
5. Hands-on, Not theory
The basis of our growing pains as a country comes from the fact that none of our talented workforce is trained for the job at hand --- and that is not the fault of anyone actually. New businesses are emerging and most of the time, even businesses that are part a larger foreign operation, operate in a different tune and rhythm here in India. As someone elegantly put --- we are requiring talent to be trained on technologies and processes that are yet to exist in India. By the time needs are identified, curriculums are set and people are trained, the platform has moved to another level. The only way then to shoot this duck --- so to speak --- is to aim for where the duck would be next, and not where it is right now.
6. The need to cross-breed
We are a nation full of pure-breeds when it comes to academia. As Robert Kiyosaki of 'Rich Dad, Poor Dad' fame, writes --- Most of us are one skill set short of making it big. Most of us are uni-talented and vertical focused. It's when business meets technology and technology meets design and design meets biology that new models emerge, and the spark of innovation gets unleashed. There is no written book on entrepreneurship --- nor will there ever be. The best answer for most questions on entrepreneurship --- atleast the bit where it's a journey into a new space, is unchartered. Sadly one often bumps into an entrepreneur or two who flaunt the skillset they possess and are even more proud to say that they don't understand anything else --- that's a recipe for disaster. Uni-talented people make great entry-level staff. If you want to grow beyond that, then buckle up and dive in into something you've never heard of before.
A wiseman once told me that life is a balance between many things. In life, it's the balance between commitment and passion --- you have an obligation to your family and those around you which tie you down and then there is your passion, the thing that makes you feel alive. In business, there is a fine balance of creativity and processes that can make an organization scale. The art of adapting our levels according to the situation --- which is the key to what Jim Collins calls as the 'Genius of the AND' --- is something we need to nurture, not by education alone but also as a personal agenda for our own sake. Indians, I believe, are by nature entrepreneurial. In a country where most of life is not defined and we have to survive by instincts and unsaid rules, entrepreneurship comes naturally --- but the pity is that it's un-honed and not one that carries the confidence of scale.
An apprentice learns operations on the floor of the shop and by being part of an existing organization. But the mindset to really start a new enterprise and to make the leap to build empires is not born by working under someone, but by the conversations that go around the dinner table at home. If as a country we aren't producing enough entrepreneurs then our homes and our second homes and the schools we are educated in are at fault. If only b-schools could do something about it that the country's next decade of growth would be debted to.
Vijay Anand is a Serial Entrepreneur and currently heads the Incubation Centre at the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Madras and is also the founder of various initiatives in the Startup landscape in India, Including The Startup Centre, Proto.in etc. He is known popularly as The Startup Guy and tweets at @vijayanands.
- Page 1 of 2
-
luckymurari Nice article Vijay and all the best for The Startup Centre
#1 • 18 Feb '11 Like -
rbc.2511 Vijay... I believe you subscribe to the opinion that Entrepreneurship cannot be taught. That notion is definitely at odds with b-schools doing anything to hone entrepreneurial skills. Any program in B Schools will operate within the vacuum of the campus or under the brand of the campus. I don't this they can do anything to substantially spark off entrepreneurial ambition or prepare entrepreneurs for the real world. What can definitely be done is addressing the selection of students that participate in B Schools to reward people with entrepreneurial streak. I believe that as the start-up/business ecosystem evolves and starts awards entrepreneurship by itself (not just success), more people will be a part of it including B-School grads. The sames seems to be happening abroad at the moment.#2 • 18 Feb '11 Like -
singhn I feel that most of us are afraid to plunge to entrepreneurship due to lack or complete absence of safety net of financial security to fall back upon. It often becomes suicidal to encounter a failure in a startup.#3 • 20 Feb '11 Like -
megoru Need to impart entreprenueship qualities from chilhood itself by encouraging children to take certain roles at school, in sports and in family.#4 • 24 Feb '11 Like -
Alain Which B-School has produced more entrepreneurs(apart from IIM-A) ? Any data available on this ? Hows the E-Cell in SJMSOM ? How many ppl sit out of placements and opt for startups in SJMSOM placements ? P.S. I m an aspirant with long term vision as an entrepreneur.(Guess most of us will have the same vision :-))#5 • 24 Feb '11 Like -
shady54 Don't you puys feel, just the desire or intention to be an entrepreneur is not good enough!! I mean whenever a business student is asked,'would you start your own venture?' 90% of the time, the answer would be 'would first complete my mba,take up a job, get some good experience and then may be yeah!!' I think this is where most of us miss the point!! When we look at history, the most successful entrepreneurs started off very early in their life!! Take Bill Gates or Steve Jobs or a contemporary entrepreneur like Mark Zukerberg or someone eccentric as Sean Parker!! They all started off early with one tool in their pocket 'AN IDEA' Imagine if Bill Gates or Steve jobs had thought like most of us and say 'hey lemmie work for IBM for 10-15 years, learn about the industry,take it as it comes and then think of venturing into the computers!!' If this was the case, most of us would had still been hocked to the big walkman's instead of i-pods and we can imagine the quality of the OS in our computer systems
So, I think all we need is to 'GET IDEA SIRJIS'
:D(a big big idea)
#6 • 24 Feb '11 Like -
Apurv IIT Bombay E-Cell is more of a BTech student initiative than SJMSoM.#7 • 24 Feb '11 Like -
j47k I totally agree with shady54...what a fantastic viewpoint yaaar.#8 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
sunnywalia bang on, shady54. Trust me, out of the 90% that say they want to be entrepreneurs in the long run, not more than 5% would really become ones. I also find many people calling themselves student entrepreneurs when they are not. Someone would have just a blog/website or just an idea of a business and he/she would call himself an entrepreneur. People need to know that entrepreneurship is not just an aspiration. it is a way of life. Entrepreneurs are not created, they are born. But the generalization that MBAs cannot be entrepreneurs is not acceptable to me. Steve Jobs wasn't an MBA. but he called upon John Sculley(MBA from Wharton) once the things became big. Bill Gates had no formal business education. But he had Steve Ballmer(studying at Stanford Univ School of Business, though dropped out of it later). IMO, MBA doesn't help in a startup(where work force is less than 30) but is definitely helpful once things scale up.#9 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
khanjan @ shady54, Agree with your point.. But generalization is wrong.. You can have a lot of people who are entrepreneur after MBA and job.. There is an entire book called Stay Hungry Stay Foolish on this.. What i believe is that Entrepreneurship is something one has to have in him and can't be taught and he can use this desire at any point of time in his life.. And the generalization made have history in the economy of production. The economy is changing, now its Knowledge based Economy... So to look at past and say that MBA can't become Entrepreneurs is not valid.#10 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
Apurv John Sculley was the biggest mistake Apple made. The sad company decay during Sculley's time is very well documented. About Steve Ballmer, the jury is still out, but you have one failed launch after another... Vista, Zune, Windows Mobile, etc. And if you follow Tech news religiously, you'll know that it was Ray Ozzie who was spearheading the recent MS resurgence with Win7 / Win Mobile 7 / Kinect etc. Though like I said, the jury is still out. Even today, MS's only profitable products are those that started out in Bill Gates era. The problems with taking Apple/MS like examples while discussion MBA and entrepreneurship is that these are tech companies who are dealing with very advanced technology and science challenges and innovations that are beyond what MBAs are trained for. I can't envision companies like Facebook, Apple, Twitter, Oracle to be led by MBAs and still roll out cutting edge stuff at the speed they do. MBAs are not equipped to identify the great tech opportunities from the not-so-great ones to comprehend what to put their money after, unless we are talking about some true-blue techie who despite an MBA is still a God at code. That's rare.#11 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
ARI83 B Schools put too much emphasis on teaching entrepreneurship. They should first create an eco system for entrepreneurship. This is the way forward and would encourage people to opt for their own business. B schools focus too much on risk aversion rather than encouraging students to take risk and also helping them out in case of any failures. It is not always necessary for a student to graduate out of a B school and explore possibilities of a start up. It can surely be done after a couple of years once the person gets a hands on experience in his job. People will certainly have different views on when to go for a business....but I think it depends on whether you have been able to mobilize resources. If you have ....take the plunge.#12 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
lone_maverick @shady54, You have made a valid point, But the last thing we can do is to generalize entreprenuership...anybody with passion can do it...all you need is passion for wahat you want to do and courage enough to persist with it against odds... there are many industry veterans who after working in industry decided to strike out their own..People like andy grove, vinod dham were already working and experts in their respective technologies,when they decided to take the plunge... I believe it is much more difficult and challenging for a guy who is working and has a stable life, a family at home , to take risk and start his own company.... Mark Zuckernberg , steve jobs , bill gates have nothing to loose when they started thier company...they were young , brilliant and passionate..they can afford to make mistakes and still nobody would have ridiculed them....best thing about starting young is that people know you are not expert and you can try any whacky idea you want..... but for guys narayan murthy who were married when started it is much more tougher.....#13 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
Cool_Monk Just having people who are interested in becoming entrepreneurs is not enough. There must be a reason why America produces successful entrepreneurs. It is the whole eco-system (which has many essential elements) that needs to be replicated. Almost all of our successful businessmen inherited their organizations. The current generation may have grown them, but the initial 'seed' came from their forefathers. India has a very feudalistic society and culture that does not encourage entrepreneurs and it is difficult to break in. Who you know, is more important than what you know. That said, I cannot see where the confusion is. MBA is Master of Business Administration. Their primary role is to 'administer' existing businesses, not lead, conceive and start them. Peter Drucker has said that MBA programs produce managers (not leaders). And BTW, the management theories and concepts currently taught in b-schools are still based on 18th & 19th century Industrial Engineering thinking, wherein the top-down organization model is the central core. Current day MBAs thrive in such structures. However 21st century organizations are overwhelmingly likely to be networked (not IT, but business networks). Top-down organizations are meant to be administered and that's what MBAs are expected to do. Networked organizations need to be orchestrated, and that MBAs cannot do (and are not taught to do).#14 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
Cool_Monk @lone_maverick, You have rightly mentioned one very important factor or a pre-qualifier i.e. all entrepreneurs when they started had nothing to lose. It is important, that entrepreneurs have no Plan B. They either sail or sink.#15 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
pagalguy @Cool Monk - well said. Sink or Sail. Once you attend a business school, the tendency is to be somewhere in between and that hurts the company and the entrepreneur as well. Most guys/gals should start their businesses early on in their lives, over a period of a couple of years they can decide if they want to do this forever or find a job.#16 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
ulag Agree with Cool Monk. Here's a blog post that i wrote a couple of months back about why the US and Israel have strong entrepreneurship societies. Do check it out. http://haphazardcontemplations.wordpress.com/2010/12/29/what-makes-an-entrepreneurial-society/#17 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
shady54 Yeah!! @apurv pandit made a very valid point about John Scully, that guy turned Apple into pineApple :D...it was again steve jobs, who resurrected a bankrupt Apple and anyway, a John Scully or a steve ballmer can, no way be termed as an entrepreneur!! They are a mere managers, who made their way through the corporate ladders..!! 20 years down the line a @khanjan or a @apurv or @cool monk or even a @shady54;) may well reach where John Scully or Steve Ballmer sat!! But I doubt how many of us would well turn out to be a steve job or a bill gates
And I also agree with @cool monk and @Allwin Agnel, for entrepreneurs its either sink or sail and there is something about the American system that they produce gems of entrepreneurs!! Someone also mentioned about the book 'Stay Hungry Stay Foolish', with all due respect to all those in the books, I have one question, how many of them made it to the scale and magnitude of Henry Ford, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Zukerberg or even our own Dhiru Bhai???
No offence to all those people who have inspired million of young Indian mind in 'Stay Hungry Stay Foolish', but I can't help but wonder and also agree with @Allwin Agnel that 'Once you attend a business school, the tendency is to be somewhere in between and that hurts the company and the entrepreneur as well.'
#18 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
shady54 @ulag: Great blog man!! Awesome
#19 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
pulkit745 @cool monk - Nicely said. But I think you have generalized the MBA degree into white and black. What is can do and what it cannot. However, the difference also lies in the MBA student. How and what he extracts out of his degree? An entrepreneurial spirit will learn the basics of finance and marketing, some jargons which one needs while talking to investors. One will further observe his surroundings, learn from other's experience and study many cases all of them which will help one continuing the entrepreneurial journey. This is the knowledge age and everything right form organization to the kind of work we do, is changing. I think an MBA degree if pursued in a way to encourage the entrepreneur within, would definitely help in paving the way ahead. One cant go and start a company now just because one has a brilliant idea and knows coding. Even Mark Zuckerburg had the support of Eduardo Saverin (Harvard MBA) untill he found some PE investors with the help of Sean Parker. Which inturn proves, that Parker also believed in the need of formal business talent while thriving a startup. Unless you are extremely rich or extremely lucky, business education does help.#20 • 25 Feb '11 Like - Page 2 of 2
-
ashish.aggarwal More than the article I love the discussion on it enriched with high intellect..#21 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
ulag @shady54 Thanks!!
#22 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
DEVILISHANGEL Indian MBA is not attunted to producing entrepreneurs, It creates job aspirants not job creators. Period. Time to Change. Its not or never for India. Preferably Now.#23 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
DEVILISHANGEL Now*#24 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
mba_junkie we hold back because we always brings opportunity cost in terms of 'plush salaries' into consideration. the only way you can take the plunge is by not thinking about this next best alternative.because after all its only 'next best' and not 'the best'.#25 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
war_veteran @Devilishangel : No point glorying foreign MBA .. Guy Kawasaki definitely didnt talk about Indian MBAs alone
..
MBA is a western invention and it was formed with the basic idea that .. you need managers to run large organizations so create bschools to breed them. Enterpreneurship or job creators was perhaps one of the N things they expected MBAs to do. But primarily MBAs were needed to "manage" organizations .. not to "create" them.
If you have a basic idea of sociology .. then in the job strata that we see in society .. sociology dictates that there should be someone above the typical blue collar jobs .. the supervisory class. MBA was to create people who are equipped to supervise, lead organizations. That is what bschools across the world do. Nothing to blame there.
Every entrepreneur of today .. who creates an organization of decent size will need MBAs to run it at some point of time.
Nothing Indian bschool or Foreign bschool about it
#26 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
vinamrabtext looks like muttiah murlidharan..#27 • 25 Feb '11 Like -
unflappable Loved the artcile and the discussion. i am an aspiring entrepreneur. with clear goals and mba is a passport#28 • 28 Feb '11 Like -
anuragbaveja Fab!#29 • 20 Apr '11 Like
-
B I U