
Prof Shekhar Chaudhari
The Indian Institute of Management Calcutta (IIMC) has kicked-off a few radical moves in the last few months. From initiating ‘reservation’ for women applicants to aggressively going after alumni to keep its infrastructure plans ticking. IIMC director Professor Shekhar Chaudhuri, spoke to PaGaLGuY about these measures and also on his institute's contribution to homogenising higher education in India.
What, in your opinion is the contribution of older IIMs, in raising the bar of management education in India?
IIM Calcutta and IIM Ahmedabad – the first two IIMs to be established by the Govt. of India have played a pioneering role in introducing formal management education in the country and in making a major contribution in professionalising management in Indian organizations.
The IIMs have been successful in popularising management education to such an extent that it created a great interest amongst students in the country to opt for ‘management’ as an attractive career option. Over the years, some of the brightest students in the country have been opting to join the IIMs in the two year post graduate programmes. A large number of the alumni of the older IIMs are today occupying top leadership positions in different companies that straddle many industries including manufacturing, IT and ITES, agro business, management consultancy, investment banking and financial services, the NGO sector, micro finance, retail, etc. Many IIM alumni have been successful in establishing themselves as entrepreneurs and several alumni have established themselves as management gurus.
You have made a plea to your alumni to contribute funds for IIMC’s infrastructure projects, when the IIMs receive government grant.
The alumni of many US business schools have been making financial contributions to their alma maters. However, in India it is a new thing. So far the IIMs have not depended on alumni funding; however we believe that they can contribute in many other ways. Alumni funding can be very useful for undertaking many projects which may not be possible to fund through tuition fees alone. The older IIMs having reached a level of maturity and have become self-sufficient and are therefore not dependent upon the Government for funds.
In schools abroad, don't alumni play a bigger role in the school’s activities?
We see the role of alumni as being multi-faceted. Our alumni have been taking interest in organising workshops on strategic marketing and entrepreneurship. Many of our alumni have participated in conferences organised by us and several of them are currently playing very important roles as members of the Board of Governors. Specifically I would like to mention that Mr Ajit Balakrishnan an alumnus of the 1971 batch is currently the Chairman of the BOG of the Institute. Currently several of our alumni are involved in helping the institute design a programme to develop entrepreneurs.
You have recently established a research centre at IIMC, but are yet to get to a 100% case-study teaching method.
I am very confident that the case study method is very suitable for our student population. It only takes a few weeks for the students to understand the case method of teaching and learning. I sincerely believe that the case method helps the students to understand a managerial situation from multiple perspectives as in a case discussion class the faculty conducts the class in such a way that multiple viewpoints impinging on the situation are brought out. The problem that we are facing is the lack of enough cases of Indian origin. The IIMC Case Research Centre has been established with the objective of developing Indian cases for classroom use as well asoto promote case-based research.
So our approach to research is hampering our global reputation?
The older IIMs have already made a name for themselves. Their students are recognised all over the world, especially in the top institutions in the United States, Europe, Asia and Australia. IIMs are today recognised for their excellence in teaching but they have yet to make a mark in research and publications.
Selection criteria in the IIMs always attracts attention.
Each IIM has its own selection criteria; however in general, they look for various qualities that are essential to become business leaders. CAT measures different abilities including quantitative ability, data interpretation and verbal reasoning. A leader requires many other qualities which are attempted to be identified in the interview stage. Because of this, the weightage of CAT scores in the selection process has come down.
And diversity continues to be the buzz word.
In real life there is a lot of diversity but in the classroom in IIMs there is little diversity. Our intention is to mirror in the classroom the real diversity that is present outside. By giving additional marks to women and non- engineering applicants we would like to change the character of the applicant pool so that the selection of the final list of students to be admitted is from a larger pool.
Even after three years, the online CAT continues to be questioned.
The computer based CAT is very new. Over time my feeling is that this test would evolve into the adaptive type test.
Don't placements play the biggest role in b-school selection?
I agree that the applicants do give a lot of importance to ‘placements’ in deciding on which IIM to join. It is very natural for a candidate who has to shell out approximately Rs 10-15 lacs for the two year programme. However students need to realise that earning money cannot be the only factor that will bring happiness in life. The IIMs are trying to convey this message to the students through different courses and counselling sessions.
http://forbesindia.com/article/boardroom/iima-needs-to-step-out-into-the-real-world/33689/1
http://forbesindia.com/article/boardroom/iima-did-not-evolve-fast-enough/33747/1
Better yet, instead of creating hoopla over diversity - something you can not totally control, start embracing what you already have. Engineers are the backbone of this country. You may despise us, but you can't stop us.
It is impossible to stop quotas as they are mandated by the government. Not happening any time in the short term atleast.
When you start getting subjective with 2L plus aspirants, it becomes a very tough game. That too with RTI rearing its head. It becomes quite tough to objective to judge subjective answers. And CAT is more of an elimination criteria today. And not the only criteria, at all IIMs today. Which I feel, is the right way to go
Being a government institute, there is only so much that you can oppose the government on. This is one thing where they cannot. It will only lead to a LOT of bad blood, bad publicity.
Do you answer pyschometric or ethical questions honestly? Or do we go for the answer that will help us getting selected?
Have they realised this thing recently or Leaders have changed their traits over the years?
Note: No offense meant. Not ready to argue as well.
Everything you reported is picture perfect , you just walked over one detail- That Mighty race was not only for Greyhounds. It was one race for all kinds of dogs- the Hounds, the Terriers, the Mastiffs, the smallest Chihuhua and the biggest Great Dane. All kind of dogs were made to run one same race - so as to create a so called - level playing field.
IIMs anyway had to increase the number of seats, it is just that Kapil Sibal gave a name to the inrease in seats and tried to make everyone happy..
So it is like giving name to the increase, not more than that..
@Ricky25 - people always assume by just pulling one example, but what they assume is actually not true. If there exists an opportunity to case study different sets of people among broadly classified groups in India, then comes the reality which the government is aware of right from 1951.
The IIMs should be the "ABODE for THE BEST" and not a "SHRINE for THE MEDIOCRE".. The IIMs are trying to ape the West where there are equal number of boys and girls belonging to the CREAMY LAYER in terms of TALENT take science, arts, commerce, engineering, medical etc. In India, the situation is quite different.
You select the 50 best schools in each state (28 states are there), then select the top 10 students in class 7 to class 10 (40 CREAMY LAYER students from each school). Now you have a pool of 50x28x40= 56,000 students.. You ask these 56,000 CREAMY LAYER students just one question-- "What do you want to become in the future??"...... Out of those 56,000 students, 50,000 will say "ENGINEER", 5,000 will say "DOCTOR", and the rest 1,000 may say Arts, Commerce, Mass Comm, Pure Science graduate..
So, you see that there is no diversity in the creamy layer in India. >90% of the top students of the country want to become ENGINEERS. Till date, I haven't seen the topper of a reputed school wanting to do Arts/ Commerce. >95% of those who take arts/Commerce in PLUS TWO are those who do not have sufficient marks to get Science in a good school or those who do not feel they are good enough to crack the competitves like IIT/AIEEE and that they would rather pursue something where competition is less. I have rarely seen a CREAMY LAYER guy or gal take Arts/Commerce of their will.
So when there is no diversity in the CREAMY LAYER (in terms of talent) in the country, when >90% of the CREAMY LAYER become engineers, then expecting a diversity of <90% engineers in an IIM is really like replacing CREAMY LAYER engineers with MEDIOCRE arts/commerce guys.... Which is indeed very unfortunate..
I am a guy from the general category pursuing engineering from a government engineering college (stingy professors, low marks) and when I learn that the IIMs hate me....I....I feel blessed,....now it will be quite sweet when I enter a top notch IIM...You hate me, so I'll be there...