Please continue here for all the Quant queries and discussions. The links to the previous threads are: Part 1 http://www.pagalguy.com/forum/quantitative-questions-and-answers/74662-official-quant-thread-cat-2012-a.html Part 2 http://www.pagalguy.com/forum/quantitative-questions-and...
Let the ages be x and 75 -x x - a = 75 -x => a = 2x - 75, so father's age was equal to son's age 2x-75 years ago At that time, son's age = 75-x -2x + 75 = 150 - 3x x = 8*(150-3x) x = 48 Father = 48 years, Son = 27 years
@dead_alive said: from arun sharma , page 101 ... pre assessmen test .. "I am eight times as old as you were when I was as old as you are " . said a man to his son. Find out their present ages if the sum of their ages is 75 years
Let the ages be x and 75 -x
x - a = 75 -x => a = 2x - 75, so father's age was equal to son's age 2x-75 years ago
At that time, son's age = 75-x -2x + 75 = 150 - 3x
x = 8*(150-3x)
x = 48
Father = 48 years, Son = 27 years
May be the destination is not for me, but the journey is..http://www.pagalguy.com/forums/chit-chat/shoutbox-t-83788/p-3594016/r-4343099
from arun sharma , page 101 ... pre assessmen test .. "I am eight times as old as you were when I was as old as you are " . said a man to his son. Find out their present ages if the sum of their ages is 75 years
from arun sharma , page 101 ... pre assessmen test ..
"I am eight times as old as you were when I was as old as you are " . said a man to his son. Find out their present ages if the sum of their ages is 75 years
A cube, one centimetre on a side, is sliced into two equal halves in such a way that the slice through the middle forms a regular hexagon. What's the area of the regular hexagon?
A cube, one centimetre on a side, is sliced into two equal halves in such a way that the slice through the middle forms a regular hexagon. What's the area of the regular hexagon?
You need to cut the cube in an incline. Imagine a cube ABCDPQRS (ABCD being the top face, and PQRS the bottom face, P is below A and so on). Now, imagine a line joining the midpoint of AP and CR. (It will pass through the body of the cube) Initially, the cube was perpendicular to the surfac...
@peppie said: A cube, one centimetre on a side, is sliced into two equal halves in such a way that the slice through the middle forms a regular hexagon. What's the area of the regular hexagon? plz tell me how is regular hexagon formed from a cube???? nt able to visualise ..
(3*root(3))/ 4 ?
May be the destination is not for me, but the journey is..http://www.pagalguy.com/forums/chit-chat/shoutbox-t-83788/p-3594016/r-4343099
@YouMadFellow said: Total 5 digit numbers = 10^5 - 10^4 = 90000Now, 5 digit numbers which don't contain 1,2,3 are 6*10^4So, 90000-60000 = 30000 contain at least one 1, one 2, one 3
nahi @[592846:YouMadFellow] bhai,, @[502788:sachinb3] OA is 4146
It is during our failures that we discover the true desire for success
A cube, one centimetre on a side, is sliced into two equal halves in such a way that the slice through the middle forms a regular hexagon. What's the area of the regular hexagon? plz tell me how is regular hexagon formed from a cube???? nt able to visualise ..
A cube, one centimetre on a side, is sliced into two equal halves in such a way that the slice through the middle forms a regular hexagon. What's the area of the regular hexagon?
plz tell me how is regular hexagon formed from a cube???? nt able to visualise ..
@[579232:ziddi_armaan] x=2 is not a solution, check in the original equation! You can do this question by plotting the numbers 1,3,7 and 22 on a number line. Then |x-a| is basically the absolute value of distance between x and a. Once you have 1,3,7,22 on the number line, then the LHS of the eqn ...
x=2 is not a solution, check in the original equation! You can do this question by plotting the numbers 1,3,7 and 22 on a number line. Then |x-a| is basically the absolute value of distance between x and a. Once you have 1,3,7,22 on the number line, then the LHS of the eqn is basically the sum of distances of any point x from 1,3,7 and 22.
Eg if you plot x=2 on the number line, you get the foll distances:
1 unit away from a=1
1 unit away from a=3
5 units away from a=7
20 units away from a=22.
Total distance = 1+1+5+20=27.
It can be observed that for x=3 to x=7, total distance is the same and = 25
The concentration of the milks are 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, 80. Now to make 50% milk solution, you have to make sure that not all the three are less than or more than 50%. a) One of the solutions is 20%, then the remaining two mixtures can be taken as, one of 30 or 40 => 2 ways and one of 70 o...
@WildDreamer said: A milkman has six cans, each containing 10 litres of milk, of concentrations 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 70% and 80% respectively. If he mixed milk from exactly three of the cans to form one litre of milk of exactly 50% concentration, in how many ways could he have selected the three cans?(1) 14 (2) 15 (3) 16 (4) 17
The concentration of the milks are 20, 30, 40, 50, 70, 80.
Now to make 50% milk solution, you have to make sure that not all the three are less than or more than 50%.
a) One of the solutions is 20%, then the remaining two mixtures can
be taken as, one of 30 or 40 => 2 ways and one of 70 or 80 => 2
ways so total 2*2 = 4ways.
Or, the 2nd mixture can be 50% and for 3rd one we can take from 70 or 80 => 2 ways.
Also we could take the remaining two mixtures as 70 and 80 both => 1 way.
=> Total of 4 + 2 + 1 = 7 ways.
b) Similarly with 30% mixture, one can be 40% and the third one can be either of 70 and 80 => 2 ways
Or, One can be 50 and the third one can be either of 70 and 80 => 2 ways.
Or, we could take the remaining two mixtures as 70 and 80 both => 1 way.
A milkman has six cans, each containing 10 litres of milk, of concentrations 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 70% and 80% respectively. If he mixed milk from exactly three of the cans to form one litre of milk of exactly 50% concentration, in how many ways could he have selected the three cans? (1) ...
A
milkman has six cans, each containing 10 litres of milk, of
concentrations 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 70% and 80% respectively. If he mixed
milk from exactly three of the cans to form one litre of milk of
exactly 50% concentration, in how many ways could he have selected the
three cans?
Is the OA 199? I just found the highest power of 22 in 2006! When you convert a number x to base y, you repeatedly divide x by y and note down the remainders. As long as the numbers are divisible by y, you will get zeroes in the end.
@Foster87 said: The number 2006! is written in base 22.How many zeroes are there at the end?? 500 450 200 199..Approach please!!!
Is the OA 199? I just found the highest power of 22 in 2006! When you convert a number x to base y, you repeatedly divide x by y and note down the remainders. As long as the numbers are divisible by y, you will get zeroes in the end.
it is same as the base 10 case in which we find powers of 5 because 5*2 =10but since it is in base 22 ,we have to find the powers of 11.so,we will have [2006/11]+[2006/121]+[2006/1331]=199 zeroes
it is equivalent to asking power of 22 in 2006! 22=11*2 limiting factor would be 11 on successive division of 2006 by 11 we get 182+16+1=199 so total 199 zeroes
@YouMadFellow said:
Yah there is a flaw.
You are finding the remainder of 10^147 divided by 7 and cubing it to find the remainder of 10^147 divided 7^3.. this is not true.
342 is the right answer.
2500=(2^2) (5^4)now less den 500 so all even numbrs shud b excluded,(as 2 is a commn fctr )so 250 numbrsnowodd multiples of 5(evn multiples we hav included in 2)total odd=50 so hcf(10=250-50=200
Yah there is a flaw. You are finding the remainder of 10^147 divided by 7 and cubing it to find the remainder of 10^147 divided 7^3.. this is not true. 342 is the right answer.
@angel.mehra said: 7 is prime number,break,10^147 as (10^133)(10^7)(10^7)n 343 as 7*7*7, 10^7=10mod7=3mod 7 10^7)^19=3^19mod73^3=-1mod73^18=1mod73^19=3mod7 rem(3*3*3)mod7rem(27)mod7rem=6 if any mistak in approch pz post thnk u
Yah there is a flaw.
You are finding the remainder of 10^147 divided by 7 and cubing it to find the remainder of 10^147 divided 7^3.. this is not true.
342 is the right answer.
May be the destination is not for me, but the journey is..http://www.pagalguy.com/forums/chit-chat/shoutbox-t-83788/p-3594016/r-4343099
Actually I didn't take this question from a book. I made this question because I face problem with powers of prime in the denominator and I deliberately took the power of 10 as half of Euler of 343. Anyways, 342 is the right answer.
@Enceladus said: Bhai coz this is actually 10^147*10^147. If we say 1. then we would go back to the original question,ie, 10^147 mod 343. Hence, 342.
Actually I didn't take this question from a book. I made this question because I face problem with powers of prime in the denominator and I deliberately took the power of 10 as half of Euler of 343.
Anyways, 342 is the right answer.
May be the destination is not for me, but the journey is..http://www.pagalguy.com/forums/chit-chat/shoutbox-t-83788/p-3594016/r-4343099
7 is prime number,break,10^147 as (10^133)(10^7)(10^7)n 343 as 7*7*7, 10^7=10mod7=3mod 7 10^7)^19=3^19mod73^3=-1mod73^18=1mod73^19=3mod7 rem(3*3*3)mod7rem(27)mod7rem=6 if any mistak in approch pz post thnk u
Yes, now I am convinced. .... All I wanted was the logic to reject 1 as the answer.. Also, 10^147 leaves -1 as the remainder when divided by 7 ( by simple Euler's theorem).
@Angadbir said: You'll have to apply a different approach. (10^147 * 10^147) mod 343 = 1 10^147mod343 = +/-1 If 10^147mod343 = 1then 10^147 = 343k + 1That means 343k = 9999.... 147 timesHere, LHS is divisible by 7, but not RHSSeries of 147 9s cannot be divisible by 7 (Divisibility of 7 can be checked by subtracting alternate triplets. Here we have odd no. of triplets of '999's) So therefore 343k can never result in a seiries of 147 9s for a whole no. k.Thus, 10^147mod343 cannot be 1 Thus, 10^147mod343 = -1
Yes, now I am convinced. .... All I wanted was the logic to reject 1 as the answer..
Also, 10^147 leaves -1 as the remainder when divided by 7 ( by simple Euler's theorem).
May be the destination is not for me, but the journey is..http://www.pagalguy.com/forums/chit-chat/shoutbox-t-83788/p-3594016/r-4343099
@Foster87 said: Mee too got 200...ans not given though... MY APPROACH:multiples of 2 in the 1st 500 no's=250. multiples of 5 in the 1st 500 no's=100. multiples of 10 in the 1st 500 no's=50. hence 250+100-50=300 no's are divisible by either 2 0r 5..Thus 500-300=200 no's which are less than 500 are co-prime to 2500
this is same as finding numbers which are co-prime to 2 and 5 and are below 500
=>500*(1-1/2)*(1-1/5)=200
लेने को तो साहिल का सुकून भी ले सकते हैं ,
पर कश्ती को तुफानो से निकालने का मज़ा ही कुछ और है !!!
You'll have to apply a different approach. (10^147 * 10^147) mod 343 = 1 10^147mod343 = +/-1 If 10^147mod343 = 1then 10^147 = 343k + 1That means 343k = 9999.... 147 timesHere, LHS is divisible by 7, but not RHSSeries of 147 9s cannot be divisible by 7 (Divisibility of 7 can be checked b...
@YouMadFellow said: Yes exactly my point.. But then can we find the remainder of this : 10^147 / 343 ? It will be either 1 or 342, but can we narrow down to one ?
You'll have to apply a different approach.
(10^147 * 10^147) mod 343 = 1
10^147mod343 = +/-1
If 10^147mod343 = 1
then 10^147 = 343k + 1
That means 343k = 9999.... 147 times
Here, LHS is divisible by 7, but not RHS
Series of 147 9s cannot be divisible by 7 (Divisibility of 7 can be checked by subtracting alternate triplets. Here we have odd no. of triplets of '999's)
So therefore 343k can never result in a seiries of 147 9s for a whole no. k.
Mee too got 200...ans not given though... MY APPROACH:multiples of 2 in the 1st 500 no's=250. multiples of 5 in the 1st 500 no's=100. multiples of 10 in the 1st 500 no's=50. hence 250+100-50=300 no's are divisible by either 2 0r 5..Thus 500-300=200 no's which are less than 500 are co-prime...
@x2maverickc said: All of them do equal work. Thus each does 1/3rd of the work. So the time taken by Bhuvan = 6 days, Bheem = 8 days, Bahadur = 12 days, hence total days = 26 days. Now if Bheem does (1/y)th part of [Bhuvan + Bahadur] more, in addition to his quota of 1/3rd of the work then, Bheem's work = 1/3 + (1/y)(2/3) Bhuvan work= ( 1 - 1/y)(1/3) Bahadur work= ( 1 - 1/y)(1/3) Bhuvan takes [ (y-1)/y ] *18 days Bheem takes [ 1/3 + (1/y)(2/3) ]*24 days Bahadur takes [ (y-1)/y ] *36 days Hence, [{(y-1)/y}*18] + [(1/3 + 2/3y)*24] + [{(y-1)/y}*36]=25 we get y = 2. More work done by Bheem = [1/2]*[2/3] = 1/3
Bhai,ek baat batana-yahan par Bhuvan takes [ (y-1)/y ] *18 days Bheem takes [ 1/3 + (1/y)(2/3) ]*24 days Bahadur takes [ (y-1)/y ] *36 days
18,24 & 36 se multiply kyun kiya hai??
Calls-Kaash yahan par IIM's hota!! Converted-SDMIMD,BIMTECH(PGDM),IMT-N,IMI-K
@YouMadFellow said: @Enceladus Yes exactly.. Same doubt here.. It can be 1 too.. That's why I asked if the opposite is true or not.. For example consider this : 6^50 mod 25 Now, E(25) = 20 so, 6^20 mod 5 = 1 ( good enough till now ) Now, let's take the power series of 6 to just see how the remainder varies with power 6^1 mod 25 = 66^2 mod 25 = 116^3 mod 25 = 166^4 mod 25 = 216^5 mod 25 = 1..So here we see that 6^5 in itself is also 1. So, obviously 6^20 is also 1. But if we go by the way the solution was proposed, then 6^10 should be -1, which is not true. 6^10 mod 25 is in fact 1.
Bhai coz this is actually 10^147*10^147. If we say 1. then we would go back to the original question,ie, 10^147 mod 343. Hence, 342.
@Angadbir said: Guys, be wary of this. We know that a coprime raised to power of euler of a number, leaves remainder 1, when divide by the number. But reverse is not necessarily true. E[n] is not necessarily the smallest power that would fetch a remainder 1 when a coprime to n is divided by n. Eg,3^40mod100 = 1, where E[100] = 40But 3^20 mod 100 = 1 as wellAnd so is 3^4mod100
Yes exactly my point..
But then can we find the remainder of this : 10^147 / 343 ?
It will be either 1 or 342, but can we narrow down to one ?
May be the destination is not for me, but the journey is..http://www.pagalguy.com/forums/chit-chat/shoutbox-t-83788/p-3594016/r-4343099
Bhuvan=1/18 Bheem=1/24 Bahadur=1/36They worked 6,8,12 days respectively Everyone did 1/3rd work. If Bheem did 2/3y work extra. Work by Bheem=1/3+2/3y Days by bheem=8+16/y Work by Bhuvan=1/3-1/3y(assuming he did equal work of Bhuvan and Bahadaur) Days by Bhuvan=6-6/y Wo...
@just_nishu4u said:It takes Bhuvan,Bheem & Bahadur 18,24,36 days to do a piece of work.Each of them does the same amount of work & they complete the work in 26 days.Instead,if Bheem did extra work equal to the sum of yth parts of the work done by Bhuvan & Bahadur,they could have completed the work 1 day earlier.How much more work did Bheem do in the 2nd case as compared to that done by him in the 1st?
A) 1/9
B) 1/6
C) 1/4
D) 1/3
Bhuvan=1/18 Bheem=1/24 Bahadur=1/36
They worked 6,8,12 days respectively Everyone did 1/3rd work. If Bheem did 2/3y work extra. Work by Bheem=1/3+2/3y Days by bheem=8+16/y Work by Bhuvan=1/3-1/3y(assuming he did equal work of Bhuvan and Bahadaur) Days by Bhuvan=6-6/y Work by Bahadur=1/3-1/3y Days by Bahadur=12-12/y Sum=26+(16-6-12)/y=25 1=2/y y=2 He did 1/3 work extra
@chevy said: A milkman has six cans, each containing 10 litres of milk, of concentrations 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 70% and 80% respectively. If he mixed milk from exactly three of the cans to form one litre of milk of exactly 50% concentration, in how many ways could he have selected the three cans?(1) 14 (2) 15 (3) 16 (4) 17 P.S.-- gs bhai aapne bulaaya aur hum chale aaye
OA: 15,,,,,
It is during our failures that we discover the true desire for success
Guys, be wary of this. We know that a coprime raised to power of euler of a number, leaves remainder 1, when divide by the number. But reverse is not necessarily true. E[n] is not necessarily the smallest power that would fetch a remainder 1 when a coprime to n is divided by n. Eg,3^40...
@[419941:Enceladus] Yes exactly.. Same doubt here.. It can be 1 too.. That's why I asked if the opposite is true or not.. For example consider this : 6^50 mod 25 Now, E(25) = 20 so, 6^20 mod 5 = 1 ( good enough till now ) Now, let's take the power series of 6 to just see how the r...
@ziddi_armaan said: @Enceladus Bhai main samajh ye cheez that -1*-1= 1 so remainder is 343-1= 342 but this is also possible that 1*1= 1 ?? plzz clear this doubt ,,, i mean 10^147 will give 1 ??is it possible /////??
@[419941:Enceladus]
Yes exactly.. Same doubt here.. It can be 1 too..
That's why I asked if the opposite is true or not..
For example consider this :
6^50 mod 25
Now, E(25) = 20 so, 6^20 mod 5 = 1 ( good enough till now )
Now, let's take the power series of 6 to just see how the remainder varies with power
6^1 mod 25 = 6
6^2 mod 25 = 11
6^3 mod 25 = 16
6^4 mod 25 = 21
6^5 mod 25 = 1
..
So here we see that 6^5 in itself is also 1. So, obviously 6^20 is also 1.
But if we go by the way the solution was proposed, then 6^10 should be -1, which is not true.
6^10 mod 25 is in fact 1.
May be the destination is not for me, but the journey is..http://www.pagalguy.com/forums/chit-chat/shoutbox-t-83788/p-3594016/r-4343099
15,it will be .for getting 50%,atleast one solution must be above 50% and one below50%...so he must take either 70 or 80 as one of the 3.when he takes 70,he can take any 2 out of 20,30,40,50,80 such that atleast one is below 50 and atleast one is above 50...in all there will be 5c2 or 10 cases b...
@chevy said: A milkman has six cans, each containing 10 litres of milk, of concentrations 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 70% and 80% respectively. If he mixed milk from exactly three of the cans to form one litre of milk of exactly 50% concentration, in how many ways could he have selected the three cans? (1) 14 (2) 15 (3) 16 (4) 17 P.S.-- gs bhai aapne bulaaya aur hum chale aaye
15,it will be .
for getting 50%,atleast one solution must be above 50% and one below50%...
so he must take either 70 or 80 as one of the 3.
when he takes 70,he can take any 2 out of 20,30,40,50,80 such that atleast one is below 50 and atleast one is above 50...in all there will be 5c2 or 10 cases but one case i.e.,50,70,80 will give more than 50% ..so it must be removed...so,9 cases.
again if i take 80,i have to select 2 out of 20,30,40,50...so,6 cases(we havent taken 70 as it has already been taken before)..so total 15 cases
लेने को तो साहिल का सुकून भी ले सकते हैं ,
पर कश्ती को तुफानो से निकालने का मज़ा ही कुछ और है !!!
@[579232:ziddi_armaan] Bhai 10^147 hai. 147*2 is E(343). So, (10^147)^2 mod 343 = 1. Now let remainder of 10^147 with 343 be x. => x^2 mod 343 = 1. Abb bas find karna hai, the smallest whose square when divided by 343 gives a remainder of 1. So, 342 mod 343 = -1=> (342)^2 mo...
@chevy said: A milkman has six cans, each containing 10 litres of milk, of concentrations 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 70% and 80% respectively. If he mixed milk from exactly three of the cans to form one litre of milk of exactly 50% concentration, in how many ways could he have selected the three cans? (1) 14 (2) 15 (3) 16 (4) 17 P.S.-- gs bhai aapne bulaaya aur hum chale aaye
yeah please post the alternate approach! couldn't make out anything of TIME's solution scheme
@[419941:Enceladus] Bhai main samajh ye cheez that -1*-1= 1 so remainder is 343-1= 342 but this is also possible that 1*1= 1 ?? plzz clear this doubt ,,, i mean 10^147 will give 1 ??is it possible /////??
@YouMadFellow said: You mean to say that Rem(10^147) = Xand X^2 = 1 so, X = -1 ( you rejected 1 because E(343) = 294 and hence for all powers less than 294.. there would be any power will would give the remainder as 1 ? ) (We know that 10^E(343) mod 343 will give 1, but does the opposite hold true too i.e. if 10 ^ a mod 343 = 1 => a = 294k where k is an integer ? )
10^a mod 343 = 1.
so a is of the form 294k, where k is a whole number. Yes, that is true always.
Your report does not guarantee removal of this content from the site. It will be removed altogether only if a Moderator finds it especially useless after reviewing it.