Puzzle: Numbers without using '6' - Page 2
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#11)
Eccentric
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 126
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2004
20-04-2005, 03:08 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesiGuru
Now that is a impressive way to get the solution.
Eccentric did you get it on your own or its the solution given in mindsport??
Unless ur a polymath, thinking like the above is rare...

Good Job!
K
Now whats' a polymath?? I presume that I am not one and I still managed to solve that on my own!
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old
  (#12)
reachmonil
has no status.
MoD'SauruS ™
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,377
Groans: 46
Groaned at 73 Times in 49 Posts
Thanks: 1,730
Thanked 3,185 Times in 794 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere across the seas
Age: 26
20-04-2005, 03:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eccentric
The question doesn't say that there are 10000000 numbers in the listy. It just say all number less than 10000000 not containing '6', hence 10000000 is already in base 9 form.
There are only 9^8 numbers in the list.!

The question asks for all numbers less that 10000000, (This is the number on top of list) Had we been using only two digits 0,1 (binary) the 2nd number from top would have been 1111111. If we are using base 9(9 digits 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 , 2nd number is 8888888. Both these are subraction of 1 from 10000000, in different bases. I hope you got that !

Now in case I need 2nd number from top, for binary I should subtract 10 from original number. That is why I subtract base9 from of 66666 from 10000000.
Yups.... gotch it!! thanx for the explaination!


~MoNiL~

My CAT sojourn

Success is going from Failure to Failure without loss of Enthusiasm - Winston Churchill.

Some people are born geniuses, but most of us have to work hard, but ultimately we all get there. - dedicated to CAT Veterans


  Send a message via Yahoo to reachmonil  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13)
Govi
has no status.
HibernatoR
 
Govi's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,588
Groans: 3
Groaned at 16 Times in 13 Posts
Thanks: 411
Thanked 427 Times in 149 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PuNe
Age: 27
21-04-2005, 11:49 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by DesiGuru
Now that is a impressive way to get the solution.
Eccentric did you get it on your own or its the solution given in mindsport??
Unless ur a polymath, thinking like the above is rare...

Good Job!
K
hey eccentric

that certainly was difficult to strike...... R u Raman Singh by any chance

cos the same solution is posted by him in MINDSPORT, there are other solutions as well but all have used computer prog. also i think there was a typing error

"convert this to base 10, so that 6 is missing (as specified above, 6 by 7, 7 by 8 and 8 by 9) Answer = 9888597."


cos the answer is 9888497

Regads

Govi...........
  Send a message via Yahoo to Govi  
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14)
Eccentric
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 126
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2004
21-04-2005, 02:39 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Govi
hey eccentric

that certainly was difficult to strike...... R u Raman Singh by any chance

cos the same solution is posted by him in MINDSPORT, there are other solutions as well but all have used computer prog. also i think there was a typing error

"convert this to base 10, so that 6 is missing (as specified above, 6 by 7, 7 by 8 and 8 by 9) Answer = 9888597."


cos the answer is 9888497

Regads

Govi...........
Yep you are right 4 is not to be replaced by 5. Mistake !!

No I am not Raman Singh but I solved this myself, may be Raman singh copied it... you go his phone number by any chance..
   
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15)
DesiGuru
has no status.
Certified PaGaL
 
DesiGuru's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,095
Groans: 30
Groaned at 95 Times in 36 Posts
Thanks: 362
Thanked 1,020 Times in 200 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Everywhere
Smile 21-04-2005, 02:55 PM

Yes even if the scale is 6-less, digits 6 above have to be replaced with +1.
Those less than 6 stay the same.

K
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Trachtenberg System of Speed Arithmetic MavericK Prep Resources 18 28-11-2006 08:56 AM
Puzzle: Numbers on BlackBoard Eccentric Quantitative Questions and Answers 25 29-04-2005 03:58 AM
solve this puzzle!!!!!! jaisanthosh Quantitative Questions and Answers 1 21-01-2005 10:37 AM
what's the benifit of remembering reciprocal of first 30 numbers !!! catikon CAT and Related Discussion 5 16-10-2004 06:21 PM
some strange numbers starsunil Quantitative Questions and Answers 8 27-09-2004 03:05 PM

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web