|
| Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe ! |
|
IN PURSUIT OF ACME
Newbie PaGaL
Posts: 10
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bangalore
Age: 23
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 03:04 PM
Hi All,
Wanted to get a list of some quality quant books to start my preparation. Can anybody please help me out. Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
will come bak!!!
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 272
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bangalore
Age: 23
Groans: 1
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 13
Thanked 131 Times in 75 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinay4acme
Hi All,
Wanted to get a list of some quality quant books to start my preparation.
|
Hi Vinay,
u can start off with Arun Sharma Quant book.
Its bettr if u can get hold of sum coaching centre material for that matter
Regards
Soham
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the former.”
........................... Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
is gearing up!!!
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 290
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: chennai
Groans: 3
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 558
Thanked 201 Times in 86 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 03:53 PM
Found this question in one of the mock CAT papers.
There are 'n' necklaces in a safe box(n>1). Every necklace has the same number of diamonds. Each necklace has at least 2 diamonds. The total number of diamonds in these 'n' necklaces is between 500 and 600. If this data is sufficient to find the value of n, then what can be the value of n?
(1) 22 (2) 23 (3) 27 (4) 29 (5) None of these
I didn't understand the solution they had given for the problem. Can someone explain the solution for this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
BEWARE OF WHAT U WISH....IT MIGHT COME TRUE ;)
Addicted PaGaL
PG MADCAPZ 
Posts: 1,246
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mumbai
Age: 24
Groans: 375
Groaned at 154 Times in 72 Posts
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 1,910 Times in 556 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 04:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sreyu_2k
Found this question in one of the mock CAT papers.
There are 'n' necklaces in a safe box(n>1). Every necklace has the same number of diamonds. Each necklace has at least 2 diamonds. The total number of diamonds in these 'n' necklaces is between 500 and 600. If this data is sufficient to find the value of n, then what can be the value of n?
(1) 22 (2) 23 (3) 27 (4) 29 (5) None of these
I didn't understand the solution they had given for the problem. Can someone explain the solution for this problem.
|
The hint lies in the last the sentence of the problem.
500=2*250 or 100*5 or watever...
600=3*200 or 4*150 or watever...
But the question mentions that the given info is SUFFICIENT to find out the no. value of n.
so number of diamonds must be equal to the number of necklaces.
i.e. 500<n^2<600
Among the given examples....only 23 can be the answer.
Hence, answer is
2) 23
AM I CORRECT?
Last edited by navneet023; 13-01-2009 at 04:28 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Is AIMing for better accuracy :P
Da~DoC~MOD
Moderator 
Posts: 2,123
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mumbai
Groans: 0
Groaned at 43 Times in 33 Posts
Thanks: 6,967
Thanked 3,482 Times in 1,096 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sreyu_2k
Found this question in one of the mock CAT papers.
There are 'n' necklaces in a safe box(n>1). Every necklace has the same number of diamonds. Each necklace has at least 2 diamonds. The total number of diamonds in these 'n' necklaces is between 500 and 600. If this data is sufficient to find the value of n, then what can be the value of n?
(1) 22 (2) 23 (3) 27 (4) 29 (5) None of these
I didn't understand the solution they had given for the problem. Can someone explain the solution for this problem.
|
let the number of diamonds per necklace be s.
total number is ns.
500<ns<600
here,a unique solution is asked.it is possible,when,n and s are prime.but,then there would be a confusion about,which one is n and which one is s.hence,we consider squares of prime numbers.
as only 23 satisfies,answer is option (2)
|
|
|
|
|
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
IIM Indore 
Posts: 240
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IIM Indore
Age: 27
Groans: 0
Groaned at 4 Times in 3 Posts
Thanks: 1
Thanked 21 Times in 12 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 04:58 PM
1. x can either be largest side or smallest making 15 cm line as largest line
case 1:
x^2>15^2+8^2
=>x>17
also x<=15+8
x=18 19 20 21 22 23 (I assume that there is traingle with zero angles)
case 2:
8^2+x^2<15^2
=>x<13
also 15<=x+8
x>=7
x = 7 8 9 10 11 12 (again i assume traingle is possible with zero angles)
Hence answer is 12
or 10 depending on validity of above assumption since 12 is not in options 10 is correct answer
2)
Solutin is similar to x1+x2+x3=20 where x1,x2 x3 arewhole numbers ..
so soultion would 22!/20!2!=22*21/2=231
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUPER XERO
Here are some questions from CAT'08
Q.1 Consider obtuse angled triangles with sides 8 cm,15 cm,x cm. If 'x' is an integer ,then how many such triangles exist?
1.5 2.21 3.10 4.15 5.14
Q.2 What is the number of distinct terms in the expansion of (a+b+c)^20?
1.231 2.253 3.242 4.210 5.228
|
B.L.A.C.K IS DEAD , I KILLED IT
|
|
|
|
|
has no status.
Addicted PaGaL
Posts: 913
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: localhost
Groans: 0
Groaned at 74 Times in 11 Posts
Thanks: 206
Thanked 419 Times in 216 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 04:58 PM
See this problem..
m and r are two numbers on a number line, what is the value of r?
(1) The distance between r and 0 is 3 times the distance between m and 0
(2) 12 is halfway between m and r
Choice:
A if statement (1) ALONE is sufficient to answer the question but statement (2) alone is not sufficient;
B if statement (2) ALONE is sufficient to answer the question but statement (1) alone is not sufficient;
C if the two statements TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient;
D if EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question;
E if the two statements TAKEN TOGETHER are still NOT sufficient to answer the question.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Unhappy_Demon For This Useful Post:
|
harisreez (05-07-2009),
sreyu_2k (13-01-2009)
|
|
BEWARE OF WHAT U WISH....IT MIGHT COME TRUE ;)
Addicted PaGaL
PG MADCAPZ 
Posts: 1,246
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Mumbai
Age: 24
Groans: 375
Groaned at 154 Times in 72 Posts
Thanks: 1,822
Thanked 1,910 Times in 556 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 05:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unhappy_Demon
m and r are two numbers on a number line, what is the value of r?
(1) The distance between r and 0 is 3 times the distance between m and 0
(2) 12 is halfway between m and r
Choice:
A if statement (1) ALONE is sufficient to answer the question but statement (2) alone is not sufficient;
B if statement (2) ALONE is sufficient to answer the question but statement (1) alone is not sufficient;
C if the two statements TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, but NEITHER statement ALONE is sufficient;
D if EACH statement ALONE is sufficient to answer the question;
E if the two statements TAKEN TOGETHER are still NOT sufficient to answer the question.
|
Ans. E)
solns come as values of (m,r)
(6,18 ) and (-12,36)
So, no definite answer.
I can post the detailed answer if anyone needs clarification. But let others solve too.
|
|
|
|
|
Is AIMing for better accuracy :P
Da~DoC~MOD
Moderator 
Posts: 2,123
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mumbai
Groans: 0
Groaned at 43 Times in 33 Posts
Thanks: 6,967
Thanked 3,482 Times in 1,096 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 05:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unhappy_Demon
See this problem..
m and r are two numbers on a number line, what is the value of r?
(1) The distance between r and 0 is 3 times the distance between m and 0
(2) 12 is halfway between m and r
|
statement 1: |m|=3|r|
statement 2:either m>12 or n>12
from 1 and 2,
if m>12,m=18,n=6
if n>12,m=-6,n=30
cannot be deduced
so, option (E)
|
|
|
|
|
is gearing up!!!
Hardcore PaGaL
Posts: 290
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: chennai
Groans: 3
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 558
Thanked 201 Times in 86 Posts
|
Re: official quant thread for CAT 2009 -
13-01-2009, 05:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by navneet023
The hint lies in the last the sentence of the problem.
But the question mentions that the given info is SUFFICIENT to find out the no. value of n.
so number of diamonds must be equal to the number of necklaces.
i.e. 500<n^2<600
Among the given examples....only 23 can be the answer.
Hence, answer is
2) 23
AM I CORRECT?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shashank3012
let the number of diamonds per necklace be s.
total number is ns.
500<ns<600
here,a unique solution is asked.it is possible,when,n and s are prime.but,then there would be a confusion about,which one is n and which one is s.hence,we consider squares of prime numbers.
as only 23 satisfies,answer is option (2)
|
Yes, 23 is the correct answer. But I still don't understand why you assume both the necklaces and the number of diamonds to be equal. For example, if I assume the number of necklaces to be 22, the number of diamonds to be 26, it is 572, a number b/w 500 and 600. Am I missing some concept here? Kindly explain.
@ Shashank: How did you find out they have asked an unique solution. And is it posiible only when two numbers are prime? I am sorry I am weak in the fundamentals.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sreyu_2k For This Useful Post:
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |