official quant thread for cat08 - Page 278
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , ,

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2771)
KIMSTER
ZZZZZZ........
Expert PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 149
Groans: 4
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 33
Thanked 121 Times in 56 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Trivandrum
Age: 23
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 10:48 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by getintoiimb View Post
puys pls solve these with steps !

3)a shopkeeper makes a profit of Q% by selling an object for Rs 24.has the cP and SP been interchanged it would have led to a loss of 62.5Q%.with the latter CP what should be the new SP to get a profit of Q%?

ans : Rs 38.8
Thanks!
Small doubt...
when cP and SP been interchanged it would have led to a loss of 62.5Q%..

its 62.5*Q% only no?? and not 62.5%...?? just confirming...


No Rules Bind! No Boundaries Rule!!
MBA 2008-10 : IIFT-Delhi.


My CAT Story
:http://www.pagalguy.com/forum/1147458-post368.html
   
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2772)
selebratinglife
is celebrating life.
Hardcore PaGaL
 
selebratinglife's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 549
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 390
Thanked 515 Times in 177 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlantis
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 10:51 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by implex View Post
New Problem!!
Quadrilateral ABCD is inscribed in a circle with diameter AD = 4, if side AB and BC each have length 1, then find CD?
angle ABD=ACD=90 degrees since angle in a semi circle ..And BD bisetc the angle ADC can be proved by alternate segment theorem and ABC being isosceles triangle..From triangles ADB and ADC it can be deduced that CD=3.5

Last edited by selebratinglife; 16-05-2008 at 10:59 AM..
   
Reply With Quote
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2773)
getintoiimb
Be More Man.Go Get Him.."EYE OF THE TIGER" -Apollo Creed(Rocky 3)
Certified PaGaL
 
getintoiimb's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,634
Groans: 112
Groaned at 42 Times in 20 Posts
Thanks: 4,003
Thanked 3,557 Times in 1,016 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Chennai
Age: 25
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 10:56 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by KIMSTER View Post
Small doubt...
when cP and SP been interchanged it would have led to a loss of 62.5Q%..

its 62.5*Q% only no?? and not 62.5%...?? just confirming...
even i was not clear on this..but i have typed the question exactly as given in Arun sharma..quant gods here pls explain this question and the solution as well
  Send a message via Yahoo to getintoiimb  
Reply With Quote
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2774)
implex
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
 
implex's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,227
Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kanpur
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 10:56 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by naga25french View Post
i guess the number for the given condition is 510511... but i am afraid that this is not the right answer as its not divisible by 17 but this number satisfy the given condition

@implex

am i atleast close to the answer????
answer is wrong . the concept is simple
it should be k times lcm of(2,3,4..16) +1
N=k.lcm(2,3,4..16) +1
we will find the number k as 10

so the number is N=10.16.9.5.7.11.13+1
   
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to implex For This Useful Post:
getintoiimb (16-05-2008), naga25french (16-05-2008)
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2775)
implex
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
 
implex's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,227
Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kanpur
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 10:58 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by deep@k View Post
CD = 1..?
is it correct?
nopes it's not

options are a) 5/2 b) 3 c) 7/2 d) 4 e) none of these
   
Reply With Quote
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2776)
the_hate
jo beet gayi so baat gayi
Hardcore PaGaL
 
the_hate's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 271
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 830
Thanked 480 Times in 127 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: bangalore
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by naga25french View Post
New Problem:
Find the least multiple of 17 which when divided by 2,3,4..16 leaves a remainder of 1 in each case
LCM(2,3,4...16) = 2^4*3^2*5*7*11*13
=16*9*5*7*11*13

so no must be of form 16*9*5*7*11*13*k + 1 = 17*m

where k,m are integers

m = (720720k+1)/17
= 42395 + (5k+1)/17
smallest value for k such that (5k+1)/17 is integer is 10
m=42395+3 = 42398

m not confident bout calculation portion

--------------------
the calcln is wrong...must hv seen it...no ends in 8 and we need remainder 1 when divided by 5...
@implex..thnx. ur approach is better

Last edited by the_hate; 16-05-2008 at 11:09 AM..
   
Reply With Quote
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2777)
raghav507
CHILLeD
Addicted PaGaL
 
raghav507's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 959
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 582
Thanked 629 Times in 265 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NO IDeA
Post Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 11:00 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by implex View Post
nopes it's not

options are a) 5/2 b) 3 c) 7/2 d) 4 e) none of these
i think CD must be 3.5...
i have used the formula AC.BD = AB.CD + AD.BC
here CD can be taken as a variable x and the other sides can be found out in terms of x(using the Pythagoras theorem).
it will result in a quadratic equation with roots 7/2 and -4.

hence the answer...

Last edited by raghav507; 16-05-2008 at 11:16 AM.. Reason: addition
   
Reply With Quote
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2778)
implex
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
 
implex's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,227
Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kanpur
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 11:03 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_hate View Post
LCM(2,3,4...16) = 2^4*3^2*5*7*11*13
=16*9*5*7*11*13

so no must be of form 16*9*5*7*11*13*k + 1 = 17*m

where k,m are integers

m = (720720k+1)/17
= 42395 + (5k+1)/17
smallest value for k such that (5k+1)/17 is integer is 10
m=42395+3 = 42398

m not confident bout calculation portion
nice attempt but do it in a simpler way
16*9*5*7*11*13 gives a remainder 5 on division by 17
5.10+1 =51 divisible by 17
so the number is 10.16*9*5*7*11*13+1
   
Reply With Quote
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2779)
implex
is Bak
Certified PaGaL
 
implex's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,227
Groans: 18
Groaned at 18 Times in 12 Posts
Thanks: 2,051
Thanked 2,146 Times in 851 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kanpur
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 11:03 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by raghav507 View Post
i think CD must be 3.5...
yeah it's 3.5 can u post ur solution!!
   
Reply With Quote
Re: official quant thread for cat08
Old
  (#2780)
selebratinglife
is celebrating life.
Hardcore PaGaL
 
selebratinglife's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 549
Groans: 0
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 390
Thanked 515 Times in 177 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Atlantis
Re: official quant thread for cat08 - 16-05-2008, 11:06 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by implex View Post
yeah it's 3.5 can u post ur solution!!
Posted my solution..You seem to have missed it ..Anyway, reposting
angle ABD=ACD=90 degrees since angle in a semi circle ..And BD bisetc the angle ADC can be proved by alternate segment theorem and ABC being isosceles triangle..From triangles ADB and ADC it can be deduced that CD=3.5
   
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web