|
| Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe ! |
|
Half an MBA old!!!!
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 179
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: India
Groans: 2
Groaned at 14 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 3
Thanked 284 Times in 18 Posts
|
The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
30-01-2007, 12:49 PM
Hi to all,
I have tried searching all of pagalguy for a thread on Quant for 2007, but have failed and whatever threads are there are either closed or non quantitative. So i wish to start this thread, and hope it to be the official thread for CAT 2007 for quant section. Mods, please make this a sticky thread so that more threads are not opened.
I would like all quant gurus warrior, vineet and the likes to please contribute to this thread.
Lets start with the basics and fundas and get set to CRACK CAT 07.
Common PUYS!!!!!!!!!
Living on a Prayer................................
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 116 Users Say Thank You to Krack_CAT For This Useful Post:
|
abhi911 (16-01-2008),
abhinavgahoi (05-04-2007),
abhi_g1 (08-04-2007),
abs (25-06-2007),
acheiverapeksha (23-10-2009),
aditya.vsa (22-09-2007),
adityapanse (30-07-2007),
alagu (02-08-2007),
ameya_ahr (04-10-2007),
amitshanky (26-10-2009),
Aptitude (25-06-2007),
arunm (12-09-2007),
ashish abraham (16-05-2007),
B00g3ym@n (01-04-2007),
bankebihari (12-05-2007),
bhavesh.jajoo (11-04-2007),
bhokalivarun (25-05-2007),
bindlishsonia (01-02-2007),
catchpushkar (19-08-2007),
chahat_85 (20-05-2007),
chamunda (20-01-2008),
chandan83 (28-02-2007),
checkoutrobin (12-04-2007),
chummy_rams (25-06-2007),
CuddlyKitten (04-03-2007),
Cymba (30-07-2007),
debashish31 (24-02-2007),
debashis_dan (25-06-2007),
deepak_nanhu (12-02-2007),
dizzy8 (06-07-2007),
dsotm_floyd (03-09-2007),
gaurishankar (20-09-2007),
getintoiimb (30-04-2007),
gmayank007 (19-05-2007),
godsforgottench (23-09-2007),
great4lalit (13-03-2007),
hariharakrishna (11-04-2007),
HarshaRocks (21-02-2007),
Honey_CAT2007 (20-04-2007),
hrishi2111 (24-08-2007),
h_star (22-02-2007),
IamMad (03-03-2007),
incognito1 (14-08-2007),
indiana0072003 (07-03-2007),
iyervani (28-05-2007),
Jlogic (28-06-2007),
jonnalp (23-08-2007),
jordan (20-09-2007),
JOURNEYTOTHEIIM (25-06-2007),
k.abhishek.k (12-07-2007),
kaundinya (02-11-2007),
kcatk (10-01-2008),
khhyatii (31-10-2007),
krishna_matrix (19-09-2007),
kunal_chemical (16-07-2007),
lalitha pavi (03-09-2007),
leelavinodkumar (13-05-2007),
manishpatel (11-01-2008),
marisha_singh (24-05-2007),
maxximus (18-05-2007),
medulla (25-11-2007),
meenakshi77 (12-06-2007),
midhun murali (22-08-2007),
miles (12-04-2007),
mjdoley (28-07-2009),
nitin_soni19 (20-03-2007),
nowornever708 (25-05-2007),
paneer_sels (07-09-2007),
pgl007 (25-05-2007),
pipin (08-05-2007),
pradeepgnit (17-06-2007),
prashtic (21-05-2007),
Pratul19 (13-03-2007),
princeparas (10-04-2007),
pr_chetana (12-06-2007),
puneet_champ1 (19-09-2007),
rahulworld (21-05-2007),
rajan24u (02-02-2007),
rani_das (27-02-2007),
rapturousgautam (25-08-2007),
ravishin_dude (30-01-2007),
rd_g (26-04-2009),
Robaroo... (12-04-2007),
Rockeeze (26-05-2007),
rrobin85 (22-11-2007),
rustyguy (19-06-2007),
sastry751 (27-02-2007),
satishmedos (23-11-2007),
saurabh_22 (13-05-2007),
scorpion_girl (15-11-2007),
shaktikeshri (30-08-2007),
sharang (13-06-2007),
sher_meena (26-06-2007),
shivakanthm (21-05-2007),
shivs (03-06-2007),
simplyrajat (09-10-2007),
snehal_shukla (08-09-2007),
somewhat_lost (01-02-2007),
sorabh11 (04-06-2007),
STALWART (16-05-2007),
stud_baba (23-07-2007),
swayamsarangi (24-07-2007),
talk2naveen (13-05-2007),
theragsin (04-07-2007),
varunthelibran (26-03-2007),
vibhu1.618 (19-06-2007),
vikas.gupta (27-07-2007),
vimala mary (19-07-2007),
vipul88 (11-03-2009),
Virtualash (04-07-2007),
vrk1219 (21-03-2007),
whizkid_amit (11-02-2007),
whoiscnu (14-05-2008),
writetotanveer (30-01-2007),
yeshwanth1605 (17-08-2007),
_lakshya (02-03-2007)
|
|
Half an MBA old!!!!
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 179
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: India
Groans: 2
Groaned at 14 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 3
Thanked 284 Times in 18 Posts
|
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
30-01-2007, 01:38 PM
OK... Consider this...
Mentally Divide any 2, 3 or 4Digit Number by any 1-digit Number with Decimal Precision
When asked to do division in your head, it's very impressive to be able to carry the answer out to several decimal places. When dividing by a 1-digit number, it's not that difficult, either.
First, you need to remember all the possible decimal equivalents for each single digit divisor. Most people will already know the first few decimal equivalents:
1/2=.5
1/3=.333...
2/3=.666...
1/4=.25
2/4=1/2=.5
3/4=.75
What are the rest? 5ths are easy, as you simply double the dividend, and place the decimal in front of that number:
1/5=.2
2/5=.4
3/5=.6
4/5=.8
With 6th, you already know 3 of the 5 decimals from above:
2/6=1/3=.333...
3/6=1/2=.5
4/6=2/3=.666...
You simply need to learn just two more 6ths:
1/6=.1666...
5/6=.8333...
7ths have a very unique pattern! Let's start with 1/7:
1/7=.142857142857142857...
All you have to do for 7ths is to remember the sequence 142857 (which repeats over and over again). Each 7th will always contain this same sequence, and only the starting point will change!
To find the appropriate starting point, take the dividend and multiply it by 14 (you should be able to do up to 14*6 in your head fairly quickly of course). Find the place in the 142857 sequence closest to this number, and you'll have the appropriate starting place!
Starting again with 1/7, we simply think (1*14=14, so 1/7 starts at the 14, and is thus equal to .142857142857...)
Here's how you figure the rest of the 7ths, with the thought process in parentheses:
2/7 (2*14=2 =.2857142857142857...
3/7 (3*14=42)=.42857142857142857...
4/7 (4*14=56)=.57142857142857...
5/7 (5*14=70)=.7142857142857...
6/7 (6*14=84)=.857142857142857...
Once you see the pattern and practice it, 7ths are very simple.
8ths are also very simple, as they are half-steps in-between the 4ths. Simply multiply the dividend by 125, and place the decimal in front of it:
1/8=.125
2/8=1/4=.25
3/8=.375
4/8=1/2=.5
5/8=.625
6/8=3/4=.75
7/8=.875
9ths seem like they should be hard, but all you have to do is repeat the dividend over and over:
1/9=.111...
2/9=.222...
3/9=.333...
4/9=.444...
5/9=.555...
6/9=.666...
7/9=.777...
8/9=.888...
Just for reference, 10ths and 11ths aren't hard, and can be done in your head easily, as well.
For 10ths, simply place a decimal in front of the dividend:
1/10=.1
2/10=.2
3/10=.3
4/10=.4
5/10=.5
6/10=.6
7/10=.7
8/10=.8
9/10=.9
For 11ths, you need to know your 9 times table up to 10:
1/11=.090909...
2/11=.181818...
3/11=.272727...
4/11=.363636...
5/11=.454545...
6/11=.545454...
7/11=.636363...
8/11=.727272...
9/11=.818181...
10/11=.909090...
With a little practice, these decimal equivalents will come to mind quickly.
Now for the full feat. To keep things simple, start working with 2 digit numbers.
Have someone choose any 2-digit number and any 1-digit number, and you can announce the result of dividing the larger number by the smaller one. For example, let's say they choose 59 divided by 6.
You should quickly realize that the closest multiple of 6 to 59, without going over, is 54 (6*9). So, the answer is 9 and 5/6ths. Instead of saying it that way, however, you remember 5/6 = 0.833, and so the answer is 9.833.
People see decimals as very complex, so this is very impressive, yet not hard to do.
For 3- and 4-digit numbers, you need to practice working through the division problem from left to right in your head.
Starting with a 3-digit example, let's try 698 divided by 7. Beginning with the leftmost digit, we quickly see that 7 won't go into 6, so we move to the next digit. 7 will go into 69 nine times, so our answer is 90-something. Taking away 63 (7*9), that leaves us with 68 to work with. 7 can go into 68 nine times, as well, so that gives us 99, with 5 as a remainder, or 99 and 5/7ths. Remember the decimal equivalent of 5/7ths? This means you can give the answer as 99.7142857 in short order.
4-digits work the same way, with one extra step, of course. 4732 divided by 6? Let's try it:
4/6=won't work
47/6=7, carrying the 5 (47-42=5), so it's 700 something
53/6=8, carrying the 5 (53-48=5), so it's 780 something
52/6=8, carrying the 4 (52-48=4), so it's 788 and 4/6, or 788 2/3
Translated into decimal form, you say "788.666".
Even if you never get comfortable with 4-digit numbers, dividing 3-digit numbers by 1-digit numbers is still impressive, especially when you can carry it out to many decimal places.
Living on a Prayer................................
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 141 Users Say Thank You to Krack_CAT For This Useful Post:
|
abhi911 (16-01-2008),
ABhishek009 (01-02-2009),
abhi_g1 (08-04-2007),
abijith13 (10-05-2007),
Adroitami (17-07-2007),
agrawalansh (04-06-2007),
Ajay Periwal (19-08-2007),
alok_som (22-08-2007),
Amidala (27-03-2007),
aniruddha_recd (05-02-2007),
anuradha12 (18-03-2007),
apk99 (15-05-2007),
arjita (28-08-2007),
arsenik (23-02-2007),
aviva (22-04-2007),
av_biswas (06-06-2007),
bankebihari (12-05-2007),
beldcat (02-02-2007),
black_stallion (12-06-2007),
Caliber (11-12-2007),
catmagic (28-10-2007),
catxatman (03-03-2007),
cat_2009 (25-01-2009),
Ch!Nk (02-04-2007),
chakde (04-09-2007),
chandan83 (28-02-2007),
charlynvijay (30-01-2008),
checkoutrobin (12-04-2007),
Cute.Sid (10-01-2008),
dancingqueen (07-02-2007),
Darth Maul (11-04-2007),
deepak_nanhu (12-02-2007),
Destiny's_Child (11-02-2007),
devangbparikh (28-02-2007),
Devilz_Den (30-05-2007),
diptichinu (11-05-2007),
dope is hope (28-02-2007),
EPluribusUnus (17-07-2007),
gargivaish (23-09-2007),
garimaa (14-05-2007),
getintoiimb (09-05-2007),
getneonow (10-04-2007),
gmayank007 (18-05-2007),
GUTSO (02-02-2007),
harshavardhanc (28-02-2007),
highflyer (13-05-2007),
Honey_CAT2007 (20-04-2007),
horrible (02-02-2007),
hrishi2111 (25-08-2007),
IamMad (03-03-2007),
ideacrash (12-04-2007),
IIMA-Dream07 (10-09-2007),
indiana0072003 (07-03-2007),
indranil.2007 (12-05-2007),
jeevan18 (02-03-2007),
Jlogic (28-06-2007),
jonnalp (22-08-2007),
JOURNEYTOTHEIIM (18-03-2007),
jyotsna07 (14-03-2007),
k10kamat (12-10-2007),
kalkhrab (27-01-2009),
karun3009 (14-05-2007),
khhyatii (31-10-2007),
kunal_chemical (16-07-2007),
lekru (24-05-2007),
machoman (08-02-2007),
madhu15122007 (20-08-2007),
mahasvi (04-02-2009),
marcoz (23-03-2008),
mbain2007 (21-10-2007),
medulla (25-11-2007),
mikshy (16-08-2007),
mitr333 (07-03-2007),
nadmaddies (28-06-2007),
najmuddin (06-08-2007),
nilaytiw (06-03-2007),
nishant_rungta (27-02-2007),
nishish (31-05-2007),
nvh (29-05-2007),
OperationBLACKI (12-02-2007),
paneer_sels (07-09-2007),
parul.s (08-08-2007),
pavs4183 (03-02-2008),
pgl007 (25-05-2007),
pintu3336 (14-01-2008),
poojam (20-06-2007),
prashtic (21-05-2007),
prateekprk (27-04-2009),
Pratul19 (13-03-2007),
prem_ravi (17-08-2007),
priyom (28-02-2007),
pr_chetana (13-06-2007),
punkprincess (01-06-2007),
p_souvick (09-03-2007),
Queeny (25-05-2007),
rah23sinha (27-06-2007),
rajeevsinghbagh (09-09-2007),
rajgopalraju (25-06-2007),
rajkaustubh (06-10-2007),
rakhihere (24-05-2007),
rani_das (27-02-2007),
ravi.gupta (27-10-2009),
raviteja_yvr (20-09-2007),
Rip Van Winkle (07-08-2007),
Robaroo... (12-04-2007),
rocksta12 (31-05-2009),
rustyguy (25-06-2007),
saishyam (06-06-2009),
sandeep44 (26-12-2007),
sanjayr84 (31-07-2007),
santosh_018 (09-04-2007),
sau_333 (31-07-2007),
scorpion_girl (15-11-2007),
seth_akanksha (20-08-2007),
shaktikeshri (30-08-2007),
shivakanthm (21-05-2007),
ShreeMaya (06-06-2007),
Shruti Challani (18-01-2008),
skylark (11-03-2007),
SMadhusmita (08-08-2007),
somewhat_lost (24-04-2007),
sonal019 (06-08-2007),
soumit mullick (28-04-2007),
sowmyag (12-04-2007),
suave.saurabh (11-03-2007),
Subroto (26-05-2007),
Sudheshna (02-05-2007),
sudipec0412 (13-03-2007),
sunil mehta 3 (16-05-2007),
technogeek (10-05-2007),
varshita (25-05-2007),
varunthelibran (26-03-2007),
VENGAI (13-11-2007),
vidsnayak (05-06-2007),
Vijay_ssn (25-06-2007),
vipul88 (11-03-2009),
Virtualash (04-07-2007),
vishalsinha123 (30-08-2007),
vrk1219 (21-03-2007),
yerneni (04-04-2007),
yeshwanth1605 (17-08-2007)
|
|
Half an MBA old!!!!
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 179
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: India
Groans: 2
Groaned at 14 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 3
Thanked 284 Times in 18 Posts
|
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
30-01-2007, 01:41 PM
Q) Find the remainder when 2000^1000 is divided by 13.
This involves some Euler number thingy which makes this problem very simple. Can some one please throw some light on this Euler concept.
Living on a Prayer................................
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says NO Thank You to Krack_CAT For This Un-useful Post:
|
sandeep44 (13-10-2007)
|
|
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
FMS Delhi 
Posts: 169
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mumbai -> Delhi
Age: 26
Groans: 3
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 478
Thanked 333 Times in 106 Posts
|
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
30-01-2007, 02:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krack_CAT
Can some one please throw some light on this Euler concept.
|
Euler's thm (a generalization of Fermat's little thm) states tht
if n is a +ve integer
a is co-prime to n
then a^{φ(n)} = 1 (mod n)
where φ(n) is Euler's totient function of n
This means tht a^{φ(n)} when divided by n gives the remainder as 1.
Finding φ(n) :
Express n in terms of its prime factors..
Say n = (x^p)(y^q)(z^r)..where x,y,z are prime nos..
then φ(n) = n * (1-{1/x}) * (1-{1/y}) * (1-{1/z})
NOTE : if n is prime, then φ(n) will always be (n-1)..After all,all the nos less than a Prime No are Co-Prime to it..
- Maulin
Last edited by maulin; 10-05-2007 at 10:48 PM.
Reason: correction in formula :)
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to maulin For This Useful Post:
|
ankitrai (09-02-2007),
dishant777 (19-06-2007),
hameed (17-08-2007),
HarshaRocks (21-02-2007),
Jaskiran (14-05-2007),
jonnalp (23-08-2007),
paneer_sels (07-09-2007),
rakhihere (24-05-2007),
rani_das (27-02-2007),
whoiscnu (14-05-2008),
zapped (01-07-2007)
|
|
says "Succeed or keep trying"
Addicted PaGaL
IIM Calcutta 
Posts: 754
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: KOLKATA
Groans: 210
Groaned at 10 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 3,376
Thanked 2,313 Times in 511 Posts
|
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
30-01-2007, 03:12 PM
i guess the remainder when 2000^1000 is divided by 13 is: 3
here z how i did it:
2000/13 gives a remainder of (-2)
so we need to find the remainder when (-2)^1000/13
(-2)^4/13 gives a remainder of 3
so we need 2 find out the remainder of (3)^250/13
now 3^3/13 gives a remainder 1
so we break 3^250= 3^249 * 3
the 1st part wil give a remainder 1.
hence the final remainder is (1*3)=3
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to rik_12 For This Useful Post:
|
acheiverapeksha (23-10-2009),
AmarNath538 (08-07-2009),
Arulkumar (24-03-2008),
astute_surfer (26-09-2007),
catchpushkar (19-08-2007),
catxatman (05-08-2007),
felinenexus (08-06-2007),
gtinside (08-06-2007),
k10kamat (12-10-2007),
kailash pande (03-08-2007),
kunal_chemical (16-07-2007),
lekru (24-05-2007),
Mani_23 (07-10-2009),
paneer_sels (07-09-2007),
shaktikeshri (30-08-2007),
sharqasm (20-08-2007),
yeshwanth1605 (17-08-2007)
|
|
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
FMS Delhi 
Posts: 169
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mumbai -> Delhi
Age: 26
Groans: 3
Groaned at 2 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks: 478
Thanked 333 Times in 106 Posts
|
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
30-01-2007, 04:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krack_CAT
Q) Find the remainder when 2000^1000 is divided by 13.
|
(2000^1000) mod 13 = ({154*13-2}^1000) mod 13
= ({-2}^1000) mod 13 (...coz all other terms would
involve a power of 13, which on dividin by 13 will give
rem as 0)
= ({-2}^{12*83} * {-2}^{4}) mod 13...(This is where
Euler's thm Comes in..coz 12 is the euler no for 13)
= 1*({-2}^{4}) mod 13
= 16 mod 13
= 3
-Maulin
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says NO Thank You to maulin For This Un-useful Post:
|
sunil.kulyana (10-05-2007)
|
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to maulin For This Useful Post:
|
arsenik (23-02-2007),
chandan83 (28-02-2007),
charlynvijay (30-01-2008),
deepak_nanhu (18-02-2007),
divay (10-06-2007),
Greenspan (09-05-2007),
Honey_CAT2007 (20-04-2007),
kunal_chemical (16-07-2007),
rakhihere (24-05-2007),
rani_das (27-02-2007),
sandeep44 (13-10-2007),
sharqasm (20-08-2007),
vishal_9feb (04-06-2007)
|
|
Half an MBA old!!!!
Expert PaGaL
Posts: 179
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: India
Groans: 2
Groaned at 14 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 3
Thanked 284 Times in 18 Posts
|
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
30-01-2007, 04:28 PM
common dudes, post some more questions....lets get da fundas clear.......
Living on a Prayer................................
|
|
|
|
|
a CAT has (200)9 Lives!!
Certified PaGaL
PG MADCAPZ 
Posts: 1,839
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Gurgaon
Groans: 102
Groaned at 62 Times in 37 Posts
Thanks: 4,250
Thanked 6,893 Times in 1,236 Posts
|
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
30-01-2007, 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krack_CAT
common dudes, post some more questions....lets get da fundas clear.......
|
Hey !! Dont worry !!!
If the response to the thread is luke warm right now...
The freshers are probably not fully into yet..
and the old timers are probably just taking a break after a gruelling round of exams..or prepping for GDPI sessions..
So give it some time and I m sure it will pick up..
Cheers!!
Regards
Tanveer
|
|
|
|
|
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
Posts: 72
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: kerala
Age: 28
Groans: 1
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 12
Thanked 33 Times in 10 Posts
|
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
30-01-2007, 05:05 PM
This is a nice one.... but where to start... if we want to make full use of the forum we need to be more professional in approach.... we need to take a specific topic... not the generalised one like geometry, number system.... instead of that we will consider in geometry itself we will go with 2 D then move on to higher sections... giving basic idea... how to approach the problem.. short cuts.... and more over what i ve seen in these threads are we get carried away from the main idea... we should not let this happen... we should be more focussed...
an takers???
yu can count my name in this thread...
some one take the intitative and start a good topic since i am new i dont know much....
The only way of finding the limits of the possible is by going beyond them into the impossible.........
|
|
|
|
|
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
Posts: 63
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: delhi
Groans: 2
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 128
Thanked 24 Times in 13 Posts
|
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread -
31-01-2007, 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krack_CAT
Hi to all,
I have tried searching all of pagalguy for a thread on Quant for 2007, but have failed and whatever threads are there are either closed or non quantitative. So i wish to start this thread, and hope it to be the official thread for CAT 2007 for quant section. Mods, please make this a sticky thread so that more threads are not opened.
I would like all quant gurus warrior, vineet and the likes to please contribute to this thread.
Lets start with the basics and fundas and get set to CRACK CAT 07.
Common PUYS!!!!!!!!!
|
hi , first of all thanku very much for starting this thread......i was looking for quant threads...but all of them r closed ...so my wish has come true with this thread.....wellll now coming to our business i am another registered pagal for CAT.....i gave cat in 2004 in last yr of engg......screwed it big times....now willing to go for cat 2007....now the question is how will we start here....see i was going through last year of papers...& i also discussed wih many other CAT aspirants....acc. to all ...number system is the most important chapter for CAT...CAT has around 12 -13 q's directly or indirectly from number system......so let move ahead with number system.....we can pick up the questions from the prepatory books ....& discuss them on this comman platform.....we will give a perticular time for each section......i have always believed that i am quite good in mathematics...but when i was going through old quant threads...it scared me.....i don't think CAT comes with these type of tough problems.....i think it checks on the concept....wht u guys advise .......suggestions r welcome.....
"That which is beautiful is not always good; but that which is good is always beautiful"
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says NO Thank You to mohit_353 For This Un-useful Post:
|
carmaruti (02-01-2008)
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
| |