The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - Page 416
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors






Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , , ,

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4151)
kondapalli
has no status.
Addicted PaGaL
 
kondapalli's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,118
Groans: 5
Groaned at 61 Times in 26 Posts
Thanks: 613
Thanked 586 Times in 287 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hyd->Chn-> Del
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 11:23 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by junoonmba View Post
Konda bhai How did u get 72 when u compute 777^777%125?????????

777%125 = 27

E(125) = 100 and 777%100 = 77

So eff becomes (27)^77%125

(25+2)^77%125 = (...+77.25.2^76+2^77)%125...

so proceed from here.



At the age of 20 we always think of what others think of us;
At the age of 40 we don’t care what others think of us;
At the age of 60 we realize that nobody has been thinking of us

Energy saved is equal to twice the energy produced. Save energy.
  Send a message via Yahoo to kondapalli  
Sponsored Links
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4152)
esh.nil
has no status
Hardcore PaGaL
 
esh.nil's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 622
Groans: 0
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 656
Thanked 547 Times in 228 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bangalore
Age: 23
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 11:38 AM

777^777%1000... The worst remainder problem ever...
all conventional Euler, reverse Euler, CRT were useless.. The best method was using a calculator , but here is the next best method,
777^777%1000,
E(125)=100
E( = 4
777^100%125 = 777^4%8 = 1
hence taking lcm, 777^100%1000 = 1
so the problem reduces to 777^77%1000
777(603729)^38%1000 =1
777*(729)^38 = 1
777*3^228%1000 = 1
=777*3^28
=777*(3^7)^4
=777*(2187)^4
=777*187^4%1000
=777*969^2 = 697
had to do a lot of multiplication.. phew!!!!
@sachin.. buddy this is the correct answer...

@konda... pls suggest if there is any other better method?? using the Inverse Euler I was stuck at 777.x%1000 = 1 or 223.x%1000 = 999
the calue of x in both the cases exceeded the number itself(i gave up after that)..


I don't believe in fate, bcos I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life....
http://journeytotheinevitable.blogspot.com/
   
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4153)
kondapalli
has no status.
Addicted PaGaL
 
kondapalli's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,118
Groans: 5
Groaned at 61 Times in 26 Posts
Thanks: 613
Thanked 586 Times in 287 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hyd->Chn-> Del
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 11:39 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by esh.nil View Post
@sachin.. dude assume the fruits be a,b,c,o
now we have the eqn as 1< =a+b+c+o <= 11
So typically we have to calculate for, a+b+c+o = 1
a+b+c+o = 2 etc.... until a+b+c+o = 11
Though this is an approaach, it is not doable in cat and I did not do it..
The approach specified in the soln was awesome to say the least...
assume a dummy variable say x,
now consider a+b+c+o+x = 11
this will include all the above mentioned cases,
i.e when the dummy variable x=0 we have a+b+c+o = 11
x = 1, a+b+c+o = 10 and so on,
so the total cases possible = 15C4-1 (1 for the case when x=11)
= 1365 - 1 =1364
Hope my expl was helpful...
Pls revert incase of qns....

Awesome Solution....Learning some mind-blowing concepts everday at PG

Here is one which falls into the same category

I have 4 watches and I met 10 people. I sold atleast one watch. In how many ways I could have done that?



At the age of 20 we always think of what others think of us;
At the age of 40 we don’t care what others think of us;
At the age of 60 we realize that nobody has been thinking of us

Energy saved is equal to twice the energy produced. Save energy.
  Send a message via Yahoo to kondapalli  
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4154)
kondapalli
has no status.
Addicted PaGaL
 
kondapalli's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,118
Groans: 5
Groaned at 61 Times in 26 Posts
Thanks: 613
Thanked 586 Times in 287 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hyd->Chn-> Del
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 11:48 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by esh.nil View Post
777^777%1000... The worst remainder problem ever...
all conventional Euler, reverse Euler, CRT were useless.. The best method was using a calculator , but here is the next best method,

=777*187^4%1000
=777*969^2 = 697
had to do a lot of multiplication.. phew!!!!
@sachin.. buddy this is the correct answer...

@konda... pls suggest if there is any other better method?? using the Inverse Euler I was stuck at 777.x%1000 = 1 or 223.x%1000 = 999
the calue of x in both the cases exceeded the number itself(i gave up after that)..
So eff becomes (27)^77%125

(25+2)^77%125 = (...+77.25.2^76+2^77)%125...


77.25.2^76%125 = 77.2^76%5 = 2.25 = 50

2^77%125 = 2^77%(2^7-3) = 3^11%125 = 243.243.3%125 = 49.3%125 = 147%125 = 22


Hence 27^77%125 = 72

Is it any better than yours.??? ......



At the age of 20 we always think of what others think of us;
At the age of 40 we don’t care what others think of us;
At the age of 60 we realize that nobody has been thinking of us

Energy saved is equal to twice the energy produced. Save energy.
  Send a message via Yahoo to kondapalli  
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4155)
esh.nil
has no status
Hardcore PaGaL
 
esh.nil's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 622
Groans: 0
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 656
Thanked 547 Times in 228 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bangalore
Age: 23
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 11:50 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by kondapalli View Post
Awesome Solution....Learning some mind-blowing concepts everday at PG

Here is one which falls into the same category

I have 4 watches and I met 10 people. I sold atleast one watch. In how many ways I could have done that?
@konda.. completely agree with the statement..
the answer would be 14c4-1.(14c10-1)
Regarding the cat and dog problem, I am little skeptical abt the soln I gave yesterday.. I will discuss more abt it.. right now little work to catch on, will post when I get time..


I don't believe in fate, bcos I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life....
http://journeytotheinevitable.blogspot.com/
   
The Following User Says Thank You to esh.nil For This Useful Post:
kondapalli (09-10-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4156)
abhrabumba
says The Never say Die lives on...
Hardcore PaGaL
 
abhrabumba's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 549
Groans: 8
Groaned at 31 Times in 17 Posts
Thanks: 302
Thanked 598 Times in 223 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mumbai
Age: 23
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 11:54 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.s.k.abhi View Post
Sachin ur was a fundoo solution.. but i interpreted and solved it like this... any problems with my approach buddy.. plz point out..

number xy=10x+y
number ab=10a+b
similarly, pqr=100p+10q+r
xy*ab=100xa+10(ax+by)+by = 100p+10q+r

equating coefficients of various powers of 10
xa=p => xa=2x => a=2
by=r => by=2y => b=2

therefore ab=10*2+2=22
@m.s.k.abhi Sorry to post late bhai...but, see, once we reach this equation, xy*ab=100xa+10(ax+by)+by = 100p+10q+r.
we don't need to look anything further because, r=by(comparing coefficients). and also given, r=2y. So, b=2.
Only one option is there which has b=2 in the number ab.
Am I correct??


The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams
 Send a message via ICQ to abhrabumba Send a message via Yahoo to abhrabumba  
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4157)
abhrabumba
says The Never say Die lives on...
Hardcore PaGaL
 
abhrabumba's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 549
Groans: 8
Groaned at 31 Times in 17 Posts
Thanks: 302
Thanked 598 Times in 223 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Mumbai
Age: 23
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 11:58 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by kondapalli View Post
Awesome Solution....Learning some mind-blowing concepts everday at PG

Here is one which falls into the same category

I have 4 watches and I met 10 people. I sold atleast one watch. In how many ways I could have done that?
@hey Kondapalli For the question taht u posted (watches and all), it should be the number of non - zero solutions for the equation a1+a2+...+a9+a10 = 4.
i.e.(10+4-1)C(10-1) -1 = 13C9 - 1.
Please correct me if I am wrong.


The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams
 Send a message via ICQ to abhrabumba Send a message via Yahoo to abhrabumba  
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4158)
esh.nil
has no status
Hardcore PaGaL
 
esh.nil's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 622
Groans: 0
Groaned at 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 656
Thanked 547 Times in 228 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Bangalore
Age: 23
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 12:28 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by abhrabumba View Post
@hey Kondapalli For the question taht u posted (watches and all), it should be the number of non - zero solutions for the equation a1+a2+...+a9+a10 = 4.
i.e.(10+4-1)C(10-1) -1 = 13C9 - 1.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
@abhrabumba... the condition is 1<=a1+a2+...+a9+a10 <= 4.
so u are missing a1+a2+...+a9+a10 = 3, a1+a2+...+a9+a10 = 2 and a1+a2+...+a9+a10 = 1
all these added up must give 14c4-1..


I don't believe in fate, bcos I don't like the idea that I'm not in control of my life....
http://journeytotheinevitable.blogspot.com/
   
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4159)
kondapalli
has no status.
Addicted PaGaL
 
kondapalli's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,118
Groans: 5
Groaned at 61 Times in 26 Posts
Thanks: 613
Thanked 586 Times in 287 Posts
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Hyd->Chn-> Del
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 01:06 PM

How many natural numbers n are there such that n^2+3n+5 is divisible by 121?
523abc is divisible by 8,7,9. What is the value of a.b.c?
Which is greater 99^11+100^11 or 101^11 ?



At the age of 20 we always think of what others think of us;
At the age of 40 we don’t care what others think of us;
At the age of 60 we realize that nobody has been thinking of us

Energy saved is equal to twice the energy produced. Save energy.

Last edited by kondapalli; 09-10-2007 at 02:26 PM..
  Send a message via Yahoo to kondapalli  
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#4160)
sudiptabanerjee
has no status.
Newbie PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kolkata
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 09-10-2007, 01:58 PM

Hi,

Can someone please explain any shortcut method for solving the problems like "which is greater between a^b and b^a" (a^b denotes a to the power b) (e.g. which is greater between 9^13 or 13^9)?
   
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

» Sponsors










PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web