The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - Page 4
PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM
         Home          MBA Forums         PG Office Blog         Contact Us         About Us                  Jobs @ PG
Exclusive Bschool Content:      Interviews      B-School Watch     MBAs speak     Placements     GMAT & MBA Abroad      Form Notifications
» Sponsors





Go Back   PaGaLGuY.com - The Everything of MBA, CAT 2008, GMAT, XAT, IIM > Exam Resources > Quantitative Questions and Answers

Notices
Quantitative Questions and Answers Discuss Quantitative and other Math related questions. Post your math doubts and get it solved by the smartest brains this side of the universe !

Tags: , , , ,

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#31)
horrible
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 152
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Age: 24
Groans: 20
Groaned at 23 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 209
Thanked 380 Times in 101 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 10:26 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaybind View Post
the ans for 2nd ques is 60.here is the solution:
case1:take unit place=5 i.e 1 way
then 10th place can be filled in 4 ways,100th place in 3 ways,1000th palce in 2 ways and 10000th place in 1 way.so no of ways=1*4*3*2*1=24
case2:unit place=4,10th place=5 i.e.1 way
100th place can be filled in 3 ways and 1000th in 2 ways and 10000th place in 1 way...
no of ways=6
case3:unit place=4,10th place=any one of (1,2,3)i.e 3 ways
100th place in 2 ways,1000th in 2 and 10000th place in 1 way.
no of ways=12
case 4:unit place=3,10th place=any one of (1,2) i.e 2 ways
100th place in 1 way and 1000th in 2 way and 10000th place in 1 way ...no of ways=4
case5:unit place=3,10th palce=any one of (4,5) i.e 2 ways
100th palce in 2 way,1000th in 2 way and 10000th place in 1 way
no of ways=8
case6:unit place=2
10th place in 3 ways,100th palce in 1 way,1000th in 2 way 10000th place in 1 way
so no of ways=6
so ans=24+6+12+4+8+6=60
i know its quite difficult to understand but then problem is quite complex.any clarifications guys??
5 digits 1,2,3,4,5
Total number of numbers = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 = 120

In these numbers, half of them will have hundred's digit > unit's digit AND
half of them will have hundred's digit < unit's digit, because all digits are distinct.

Thus, answer = 120/2 = 60.

CAT is all about keeping the things simple...

Last edited by horrible; 02-02-2007 at 10:27 AM. Reason: mistake...
   
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to horrible For This Useful Post:
alok_som (23-08-2007), arindam83 (16-04-2007), Ch!Nk (02-04-2007), devangbparikh (27-03-2007), gaurishankar (05-11-2007), maxximus (02-06-2007), mohit_353 (02-02-2007), phytocircle (27-09-2007), rani_das (27-02-2007), ravichandra.123 (10-04-2007), Rip Van Winkle (12-09-2007), RISING (03-10-2007), seth_akanksha (21-08-2007), sharang (13-06-2007)
Sponsored Links
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#32)
Krack_CAT
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Krack_CAT's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 175
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: India
Age: 27
Groans: 2
Groaned at 11 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 1
Thanked 267 Times in 17 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 10:26 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by karthikeyantcs View Post
Mohit, Horrible and I have already come to the conclusion that 9 bags is the answer. I think you mistook our posts.
But 9 is not there as one of the options.. That's what confused me....


Living on a Prayer................................
  Send a message via Yahoo to Krack_CAT  
The Following User Says Thank You to Krack_CAT For This Useful Post:
rani_das (27-02-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#33)
horrible
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 152
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Age: 24
Groans: 20
Groaned at 23 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 209
Thanked 380 Times in 101 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 10:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by mohit.pasrija View Post
How many numbers can be formed by using 8,7,5,3,2 such that they are divisible by

125 ? Digits to be used exactly once.

(1) 20 (2) 4 (3) 2 (4) 1

Sol...for a number to be divisible by 125 its last three digits should ve divisible by 125.
so from the above given numbers.
we could have 4 possible numbers i.e.
1.32875
2.23875
3.28375
4.82375

tell me if i m wrong...
I think u r right. Here goes the method ...

Divisible by 125 means last 3 digits divisible by 125
125 or 250 or 375 or 500 or 625 or 750 or 875 or 000.

From the available digits, only 375 and 875 are possible.
For case I i.e. (--375), the first 2 digits could be 28 or 82
Similarly for case II (--875), the first 2 digits could be 23 or 32.

Hence, 4 cases.
   
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to horrible For This Useful Post:
rani_das (27-02-2007), RISING (03-10-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#34)
jaybind
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
jaybind's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 209
Join Date: May 2005
Age: 24
Groans: 4
Groaned at 6 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks: 137
Thanked 177 Times in 62 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 10:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by horrible View Post
5 digits 1,2,3,4,5
Total number of numbers = 1 × 2 × 3 × 4 × 5 = 120

In these numbers, half of them will have hundred's digit > unit's digit AND
half of them will have hundred's digit < unit's digit, because all digits are distinct.

Thus, answer = 120/2 = 60.

CAT is all about keeping the things simple...
hey buddy could u elaborate the highlighted part a bit further...dint get it...
and yes i agree that cat is all about keeping the things simple but then dont get surprised if it turns out to be complex...
   
The Following User Says Thank You to jaybind For This Useful Post:
rani_das (27-02-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#35)
horrible
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 152
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Age: 24
Groans: 20
Groaned at 23 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 209
Thanked 380 Times in 101 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 10:37 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krack_CAT View Post
But 9 is not there as one of the options.. That's what confused me....
CAT now has 5 options .. so assume the 5th option as 9 and mark it as ur answer
   
The Following User Says Thank You to horrible For This Useful Post:
rani_das (27-02-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#36)
horrible
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 152
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Delhi
Age: 24
Groans: 20
Groaned at 23 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks: 209
Thanked 380 Times in 101 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 10:48 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaybind View Post
hey buddy could u elaborate the highlighted part a bit further...dint get it...
and yes i agree that cat is all about keeping the things simple but then dont get surprised if it turns out to be complex...

Oh there's nothing to be surprised about that sir.. we all are here to learn. It incidently happened that this funda struck me upon seeing this qs. May be there is an even simpler method to it. May be you know some other thing which I would do in a complex manner. Let us learn from each other...


Let's take hundred's digit to be x and unit's digit to be y
Now, three universal cases exist for x and y.
x > y
x < y
x = y

The third case doesn't hold for our problem since all digits are distinct (1,2,3,4,5).

Since there is no restriction as such and in this situation, all the digits (1,2,3,4,5) are equally likely to get at any position, we can safely assume that there would be no distinction in the values that could be assumed by the variables x and y... ... (hard to explain... someone pls elaborate...)

Thus, x > y and x < y would happen equal number of times in 120 combinations i.e. 60-60 times.

Hence, answer should be 60 (this is how I do it in a fast manner... though it has its own limitations. Faculty told me not to apply it when one of the digits is 0... since 0 cannot be at leftmost place... kinda weird.)

I am awaiting along with you for a more lucid explanation...
   
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to horrible For This Useful Post:
Devilz_Den (30-05-2007), gmalhotra86 (09-07-2007), godsforgottench (24-09-2007), jaybind (02-02-2007), lekru (24-05-2007), madhu15122007 (20-08-2007), phytocircle (27-09-2007), rani_das (27-02-2007), RISING (03-10-2007), rosh! (26-04-2007), testing1 (30-05-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#37)
Krack_CAT
has no status.
Expert PaGaL
 
Krack_CAT's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 175
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: India
Age: 27
Groans: 2
Groaned at 11 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 1
Thanked 267 Times in 17 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 10:54 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by horrible View Post
CAT now has 5 options .. so assume the 5th option as 9 and mark it as ur answer

HAHAHAHA

But i still have a gut feeling that 9 is not the correct answer.... will try and get the "correct" answer and detailed solution


Living on a Prayer................................
  Send a message via Yahoo to Krack_CAT  
The Following User Says Thank You to Krack_CAT For This Useful Post:
rani_das (27-02-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#38)
mohit_353
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 63
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: delhi
Groans: 2
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 128
Thanked 23 Times in 13 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 11:35 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krack_CAT View Post
But 9 is not there as one of the options.. That's what confused me....
see...that was also one of my doubts...so if we need to bring the solution thank we can bring 11 or 15

in case of 11 ...we can consider another 3 bags having random no of coins like 90,30, 7...it will give 11 as answer

or we can bring 15 by considering 1,2,4,8,16,32,64........in 7 bags...it will bring 15...
wht to consider if same question appear in CAT-07 ...the minimum one....

wht. to say.....


"That which is beautiful is not always good; but that which is good is always beautiful"
  Send a message via Yahoo to mohit_353  
The Following User Says Thank You to mohit_353 For This Useful Post:
rani_das (27-02-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#39)
mohit_353
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 63
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: delhi
Groans: 2
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 128
Thanked 23 Times in 13 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 11:45 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by horrible View Post
Oh there's nothing to be surprised about that sir.. we all are here to learn. It incidently happened that this funda struck me upon seeing this qs. May be there is an even simpler method to it. May be you know some other thing which I would do in a complex manner. Let us learn from each other...


Let's take hundred's digit to be x and unit's digit to be y
Now, three universal cases exist for x and y.
x > y
x < y
x = y

The third case doesn't hold for our problem since all digits are distinct (1,2,3,4,5).

Since there is no restriction as such and in this situation, all the digits (1,2,3,4,5) are equally likely to get at any position, we can safely assume that there would be no distinction in the values that could be assumed by the variables x and y... ... (hard to explain... someone pls elaborate...)

Thus, x > y and x < y would happen equal number of times in 120 combinations i.e. 60-60 times.

Hence, answer should be 60 (this is how I do it in a fast manner... though it has its own limitations. Faculty told me not to apply it when one of the digits is 0... since 0 cannot be at leftmost place... kinda weird.)

I am awaiting along with you for a more lucid explanation...

so this means that if we change the question like if ten's digit is always greater than units digit or unit's digit is greater than ten's digit ...the answer will be same means 60.... .....

wht to say....


"That which is beautiful is not always good; but that which is good is always beautiful"
  Send a message via Yahoo to mohit_353  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mohit_353 For This Useful Post:
chandan83 (28-02-2007), gmalhotra86 (09-07-2007), rani_das (27-02-2007)
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread
Old
  (#40)
mohit_353
has no status.
Trainee PaGaL
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 63
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: delhi
Groans: 2
Groaned at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 128
Thanked 23 Times in 13 Posts
Re: The Official CAT 2007 Quant Thread - 02-02-2007, 12:27 PM

another sitter....

1.)121212.......upto 300 digits is divided by 99, what is the

remainder ?
a)15
b)18
c)12
d)22

acc. to me ans. should be 18...not completely sure.....

wht to say???

2.)3) How many rectangles can one make from a regular chess board ?
a)1296
b)1332
c)1242
d)1221

happy solving.....

guys come on ...show some entuz....




only 290 days left for the final battle......


"That which is beautiful is not always good; but that which is good is always beautiful"

Last edited by mohit_353; 02-02-2007 at 12:32 PM.
  Send a message via Yahoo to mohit_353  
The Following User Says Thank You to mohit_353 For This Useful Post:
rani_das (27-02-2007)
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

» Sponsors








PaGaLGuY.com is not responsible for the views and opinions of the posters.
PaGaLGuY.com is an Inzane Labs Private Limited production.
Hosted on servers powered by Neutral Web