The interview I was waiting for finally came. Couldn't have had cooler interview.
Venue: IFMR, Chennai
Date: 15 March.
Time: 9 A.M.
BG: BE(ECE) fresher, avg acads, low percentile
GD
7 members (one absent)
topic: "To facilitate higher rates of economic growth dictatorship(DS) is better than democracy(DM)"
Cool GD. Not very noisy. Made good contributions. Screwed up summary though. I presented all MY views and forgot to mention what consensus the group came to.
THE Interview
A: Alumnus B: Mr Bagichi S: Mr Sinha
M: Me
S took my file and was perusing it for a while.
A: What do you think about the GD? Your performance?
M: gas for a min.
A: What was your contrib?
M: Explain a few points I made.
A: All the people before you said the same. You are claiming you brought this point (abt globalistion).
M: I started off the GD with this point sir.
A: Why do you say DS will be unsuccesful in todays scenario?
M: More gas. (say something about stability)
A: In DM, govt changes so often = instability na?
M: By stability I mean wrt policies... more gas
A: Why would FIs invest in DM if DS offers more ROI? They oviously dont care about the people.
M: DM has representation from all sectors. More economic stability. People indirectly get to make the policies. Not so in DS.
A: Right. You have got this scholarship. What for?
M: ...
B: Do you have a job?
M: Yes sir. I got recruited by ...
B: So you know what your role would be?
M: Not really sir.
B: Explain your project.
M: ... explain for more than 2 min ...
A: How does Indian military camp intercept Pak camp's messages?
M: fundae (as much as I knew. At one point I said "dont know the specifics")
B: How was Saddam traced?
M:

said something about GPS to find the location.
They all laughed.
B: About GPS.
M: fundae.
S asks me to fill Guardian's name and address (hadnt done that in the form)
M: did it.
S: Why are we asking for Guardian details?
M:

Vaguely explained.
S: You are 21 years old. Old enough to start earning and and to be independent. Why do you need a guardian?
M: crapped.
Again laughter.
S: What roles do you play in cricket? (play cricket for col)
M: gas (used it to bring out my weakness and strengths) ... spoke for 2 min...
S: What is the diff b/w style & technique?
M: gas (used Lara and Ganguly to explain flair and style) ...2 min...
Laughter.
S: Ganguly is in such a pathetic state. Very far from the style you're talkng about.
M:

I was talking about Ganguly's batting five years back!
Laughter.
S: What is technique?
M: Gas
S: What is one attribute of Sehwag that makes him successful?
M: Gas
I explained for like 3 min about Sehwag vs Dravid ... hand-eye co-ord vs tech etc
A: Can you come up with a s/w to simulate the way ball behaves in cricket?
M: State of pitch has a huge role. S/w cannot ccount for off the wicket deviations (which is pretty random). But in ideal conditions we can come up with a logic.
A: Given state of pitch can we accurately determine the behavior?
M: We would need the instantaneous value of the state of pitch cause it gets affected all the time. more gas here
B: Thats right. ( He sort of nodded ... Im hoping its an approving nod!

)
S: What books do you read?
S: Fav author?
S: His style?
S: What parameters define "stye of writing"?
S:Compare with some other author.
This discussion went on for about 8 min.
B: Have you read Shakespeare's works?
M: none sir.
B: Something about english education in school.
M: gas.
A: So did you understand the meaning of "writing style"? Its like flowchart and code...
M: (I cut him off.. Dumb!

) Yes sir I understand. Flowchart is the plot and the s/w represents the style.
A smiles & he too nods ( i was relieved!)
A: What are the other calls?
A: What will you choose if you convert A & C?
M: C
A: I heard from the IIMA panel that you said 'A' to the same ques when they asked?
Laughter all over.
M: They never asked me that question sir.
A: So why IIMC?
M: more gas.
All three say thanks. Me thanks all of them and leaves.
Duration: 25 min.
Observation: In both A & C they have allowed me to direct the interview to my strong points. They rarely cut me off mid-sentence. I had enough time to elaborately explain.
Dunno what parameters they're evaluating us on.
I've done my best. Gotta wait for more than month to see if it was good enough.
Comments are most welcome.
ATB ppl.
Evanescence.