[CATalysis]

Hi everyone,

i gave the test today due to some personal reason and believe me.

It was a shocker....!!!!
Though the questions were not that tough it proved out to be really bad.

I am not giving out my result as you all will give it tomorrow.

But it was of CAT standard ...this time.

Hope for the best.

chao

Edited By Oxymoron: Have renamed the thread to prevent an unsuspecting soul to peep in and spoil his test morrow....so once everyone takes the test pm me or any of the mods who is online to revert back the title of the thread....

[anand_mbadreams]

Have you checked out the RC answers.? theyr crap! It wouldn't have been so bad if atleast they could have explained their answers better.

Take a look at the first answer : ' The author talks about like 2 different aspects, like a coin it is the reverse side but not antithetical...'
Whats the point of doling out such crap?

phew!

I think the answer to Q110 is wrong. It should be option d. ie 8, a wicket falling at a score of 5 is not possible, given the Q constraints....though its quite likely

[CATalysis]

Ya few of english answers are out of the box types.

Don't know ....every time CL people have some controversy or the other regarding the answers.

Lets wait and watch.

Q110 i have not attempted so i cannot tell much.

But the Q in which they have asked the ratio of perimeters of the square and hexagon.
Its answer shud be 4 as the ratio given is reverse.

chao

[jayesh_shelar]

Well I hit a all time low with MC-7. I am also skeptical bout some answers especially in RC and DI. Overall Quant was pretty easy.....One could attempt 20 atleast without any prep..... though I screwed it up..... attempted the section last.....Harakiri you see.

A eye opener for me..lets see guys...all the best for the 8th.

[kumar_k4u]

Originally Posted by jayesh_shelar

Well I hit a all time low with MC-7. I am also skeptical bout some answers especially in RC and DI. Overall Quant was pretty easy.....One could attempt 20 atleast without any prep..... though I screwed it up..... attempted the section last.....Harakiri you see.

A eye opener for me..lets see guys...all the best for the 8th.

i 2 hit an all-time low as far as cL mocks r concerned!!(though i was even worse in one of the free time mock tests!!)!!!
but i dont think jayesh nd my lows r similar(quant-20 attempts w/o ny prep!!!! )

getting a mere 37.7!!

sectional scores:

VA+EU+RC 19/14/5/15
QA 14/14/0/17
DI+DS 11/7/4/5.7( )

[nitika_ggn]

I also feel there is some discrepancy in quest no 107 and 109 . i am not able to get why the maximum cannot be 18 . (31 = 18+ 13 i.e one over 4*4+2 and another over 4*3+1) .. which seems to be correct .. am i missing something.. can anyone explain me plz ..

[bohemian_rhapsody]

Man I think this will be my worst performance among the mocks.

Anyways RC was a bit dicey and DI was bit tough ( attempeted only 10!!!!!!!!!!!)

Quant was pretty ok ( As said earlier 20 is do able )

Guys any guesses on cutoff

[kumar_k4u]

20 questions could've been attempted w/o ny prep!!!!
20 questions in QA was do-able!!!!


have the Gods started taking mock-cats!!!!!

[saurabhjain2005]

Originally Posted by bohemian_rhapsody

Man I think this will be my worst performance among the mocks.

Anyways RC was a bit dicey and DI was bit tough ( attempeted only 10!!!!!!!!!!!)

Quant was pretty ok ( As said earlier 20 is do able )

Guys any guesses on cutoff

hi all!
i dont know whats going on,whatever confidence i gained till mock 5 has all gone into drain...dont know what these CL guys r upto...half of my DI questions got wrong and my DI score has hit the lowest ever....EU was pretty ok but RC was wierd....and DI ,I was just clean bowled....:grab:

[dexter123]

lag gayi waat