Login | Register

Forgot Password?

Close

Past acads no cause for worry during admissions – IIM Calcutta’s Prof Anup K Sinha

What is the mission of IIM C and what sets it apart from other b-schools in the same league?

The mission of IIM C is to be an international centre of excellence. In terms of what sets it apart from other IIMs is the very open academic culture here. There is an enormous amount of involvement of the faculty members in running of the institute and designing of the activities. It is a place where academic work is respected.

Why should a student with calls from all of IIM A, B C should opt for C over A and B?

Firstly, we already have a reputation, that IIM C is what is called in the young generation jargon as a 'very acad kind of place'. There is a lot of depth to the knowledge that is imparted.

Secondly, this place has a huge reputation of a place where there are lots of extra curricular activities. We consciously try and nurture that because there is a lot of experiential learning this way. Look at Intaglio, if you see the scale of events here, you will realize that the people who are organizing it are going to carry it to their old ages. Of course Intaglio is the biggest event, but there are all kinds of smaller events in progress all the time.

Besides that, right now I'd say that Kolkata is a very happening place. Though we are
located outside the main city, there is a lot of Calcutta to discover even when you come to live in IIM C campus.

But the crux of IIM C's exclusivity lies in the mix of academic depth with extra co-curricular activities.

What is the general profile of students coming at IIM C and does IIM C prefer any profiles of educational background and work experience over others?

No. We do give a little (stressed) weightage for work-experience. For taking CAT, which is the first round of admission, the undergraduate subject of study doesn't matter. Then at the group discussion and personal interview level we check what we cannot check at the CAT level, that is a student's demeanour, confidence levels, general awareness, communication ability, intellectual ability and reflexes to an extent. I agree that qualities such as ethical ability are hard to check in that short time, but we do try to guage the personality. I think by and large the current young generation students applying to IIM C are very close to one another in terms of personality and background, how they are brought up, the books they read and so on.

How important are past academic scores in the admission process of IIM C and what can a student do to make up for bad acads in undergraduation?

Once the CAT result is out and the candidate is shortlisted, academic scores cease to matter at IIM C. I can't speak for the other IIMs, but at IIM C, we look for the academic performance aspect in the CAT. I know of past students who barely scraped through their undergraduation degrees but did get an admission into IIM C. On the other hand, I will also stress that there is a lot of rigour involved in the IIM C system of study and one has to be studious in order to survive.

Are you saying that once shortlisted, two students with the same cat percentile – but one with 45 percent marks in the undergraduation and the other with 80 percent marks in undergraduation – are on the same plane during the remaining part of the admission process?

Absolutely. At IIM Calcutta, yes.

In light of the case of an IIM Lucknow graduate working in an oil PSU who lost his life fighting for ethics and the diametrically opposite one of an IIM Bangalore graduate who was indicted for committing fraud in Samsung, a question that has arisen is how are ethics imbibed to management students at the IIMs?

I agree that ethics can't be taught, just like leadership cannot be taught. However you can sensitize a person and make the person aware. If you make him think even once that an ethical choice is an important issue, and that it can have implications which you cannot think of when you take the decision, you end up sensitizing that person.

There are two kinds of things. One is when we don't even understand that the choice we're making is in fact based on ethics. The second is when you make a choice but you don't see the implications clearly, that it can be hurtful to other people or appear very damaging to other people. How do we handle that? I think the fact that we give the understanding of such choices equal priority to say, derivative pricing, does send a message to the students somewhere.

Besides, there are specialized optional courses on business ethics in which teach case studies and situations where a typical manager would find himself in. Also in other courses like business policy or economic policy, we talk about ethical issues relevant to that particular context. Even in daily life at IIM C, we teach students to not rag juniors, we call on them to not just cut-paste material off the Internet for assignments, and if you have to take some interesting piece of information from the net, at least assimilate it and then write your own interpretation of it while quoting the source or providing the reference.

{pagebreak}

 

We recently heard that the CAT might become a computer-aided test.

Yes, Bakul Dholakia (Director, IIM Ahmedabad) did say that in a TV interview. Sometimes, very informally, it has been discussed that while the design of the exam is in constant engagement, the logistics are very difficult to handle. Yet we don't want to outsource CAT .

For example on the CAT day, you will find nobody on campus. all the faculty and their family members are roped in to look after a centre somewhere or the other. As the numbers are exponentially growing, what happens if 3 lakh people take the exam? How do we manage that? So we were thinking if online testing could be a solution. So it's still in the 'is it' phase. First we have to see what are the problems in conducting computer-aided testing, what happens if it goes wrong in backward areas and so on.

The CAT changed drastically this year (2005)…

I'd say the exam itself is evolving. Like couple of years back we started letting the students take the question paper home.

After this CAT 2005, I had a newspaper journalist calling me up frantically, asking me how do I react to the chaos, that the number of questions were reduced, this passage was so difficult, the paper had nothing to do with last year and so on.

The problem is, if we're going to screen 1,500 students from 1.6 lakh, which is a very tough job, I dont want everybody to max the paper. I want them to tell me that it's tough. So CAT has to be unpredictable and difficult.

When you look at b-schools admissions abroad, they are very subjective as opposed to CAT which is extremely objective. Do you think that the IIMs might be losing out on good future leaders due to its extremely objective admission process? If the IIMs have to become globally competent they will have to take these students aboard. But these same students might not be able to crack the CAT. What are the IIMs doing to address this problem?

There is so much excess demand for good quality MBA in India that when you look between 99 percentile and 98 percentile, it becomes a difficult choice. These students are coming from similar backgrounds and their tastes and preferences are also very similar. Who do I take and who do I drop?

The only way this can be resovled is by having a large number of good quality business schools to serve this excess demand. With a mix of such schools where in one they concentrate on solid technical fundas, and others where they look very subjectively into your background, there is a huge space for excellence. The IIMs too are constantly debating whether there is a need for more schools, perhaps with different admission criteria.

However, there is a bigger problem facing management education in India and that is the lack of quality faculty. That is a big constraint because typically a good faculty member will prefer to teach in Singapore or the US and we just cannot match the salaries he gets there. There can be people in the industry who are good practitioners and can also be wonderful teachers but they just don't have the time to teach.

So in india, unless you are very passionate about teaching, or probably you didn't land up the job you wanted so you decided to hang around teaching in a b-school, teaching is not very financially rewarding.

What are the challenges the IIMs are facing in order to go global in a big way?

There are many ways of going global. One is when you have presence in international journals, your faculty is mobile and you have lots of exchange programmes. There is tremendous scope for the IIMs here.

The other way is in terms of a campus presence outside the country. So I can open a campus in Singapore or start a dual degree with a Harvard and so on. Right now, I don't think the IIMs are in a position to exrcise the second option for the simple reason that there is such an excess demand in India, that the government as a stakeholder will not look upon that in kind.

There can be a scenario when a Wharton actually comes to India, sets up a campus here and offers an MBA programme. If that happens, there will be a lot of poaching of good faculty, and the IIMs will have a tough time retaining their faculty. That is also when the brand value of the IIMs built over the years will matter most.

Discuss this article in the Forum!

Share this:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

The following 4 users Say Thank You for this Useful Post:

hari_87 (06-08-2009) , anshul_mechie (23-09-2009) , haritude (04-12-2009) , harry_ (28-01-2010)

The following 1 user Says NO Thank You for this Un-useful Post:

amitshanky (05-02-2010)

Comments (25)

Leave a Reply
goldberg23684
#1 January 16, 2006, 3:12 pm

brilliant interview. way to go guys!

Catafix
#2 January 17, 2006, 5:36 am

Good Insight…Kudos to you

eey0069
#3 January 19, 2006, 5:57 pm

Thanks a lot for the superb interview guys- can rest a lot easier now! :) And of course, Prof Anup K Sinha's answers too are bang on the coin- just what is needed to allay fears. I'd better get on with my preps now :)

deepu
#4 January 21, 2006, 1:40 pm

Ah excellent coverage of all questions .i am waiting for Interviews of profs from other IIMs .
Plzz dont forget to ask about the imp of acads :P

iluvparixit
#5 January 29, 2006, 10:26 am

collective sighs of relief from all guys with acads they cant boast of!! ever since i realised that i wouldnt be able to manage an aggregate over 55 at the end of my graduation i had this cloud of unemployablity and "un-further-studability" looming over my head. that question of 45% and 85% being on the same plane has helped me decide on wehther i should buy the CAT form for 2006.

12345
#6 February 01, 2006, 1:45 pm

A good interview conducted by PagalGuy. I always wanted to know why I wasn't selected for the interview round even with a very very good academic record [94%] and good CAT score 97.67 percentile. Now I understand the reason behind this. India is still India and Indian instituitions are still Indian in the same sense. When institutes like Harvard, Stanford and their likes say previous academic record is equally important as your extra curricular record… this IIM-C professor does not feel even a little bit ashamed in admitting that 'IIM-C' does not care about past academic record at all and a 45% scorer is treated on equal terms with a 90% scorer even when their CAT scores are 'equal' (not even greater). At this rate I think IIM's will remain top only in India and not in the world. Putting up more campuses or catering for more people is not the only solution as these great IIM professor's seem to think. That is not their burden, do Harvard/Stanford/LBS disversify themselves to get the same effect? I thought Professors at IIMs have some intelligence but this interview just confirms the fact that they do not put much thought into their admission process at all.

Bye.

maddipatla
#7 February 21, 2006, 4:22 pm

ya xcellent interview……
i had lot of questions about the importance of past acadamic performance…..thanq guys

sahilgoyal
#8 March 10, 2006, 12:13 pm

@ pagalguy

good interview. But i m not completely satidfied with his answer of why c is better than a and b. very general answer which probably a and b can also easily claim.

@12345

97.67 u will never get into into imm cal with that score… u r being 2 optimistic

Cobain
#9 March 24, 2006, 1:43 pm

Pretty insightful interview…great work!

dogthecat
#10 April 03, 2006, 8:45 am

Great work!!! this was an eye opener…past acads, whether good or bad always makes us skeptical when it comes to CAT…looking fwd for similar interviews with other iims too..

caterpilar
#11 April 14, 2006, 6:00 pm

well done,good job,PUYs have edge.Being,PUY.

Amit_a
#12 April 22, 2006, 7:38 am

Great Interview guys thanks a lot past acdm are not that much problem but in pi they ask all sort of q including past acdmic whats then?
lookin fwd 4 interview from other iims too.

bansi1984
#13 April 24, 2006, 5:41 pm

I agree with 12345 although I dont want to be that harsh on words. I strongly believe that there is a HUGE difference b/w a 45% student and an 80% students. The latter one's score is a clear indication of consistency and seriousness about what he has been doing in his/her academic life whereas a 45% student definitely did not take things seriously and was not consistent with his/her performance. It is a fact that the IIM's take people based on their aptitude AND attitude and whether they are well rounded individuals. A 45% candidate cant be put in that category as easily as the professor put it.

morphi
#14 April 27, 2006, 11:21 am

Nice work done by pagalguy team, I always believed in what prof said about past academic performances and have seen my friends sailing through IIMs though faired really poor at undergraduate exams.
India is India and should be India. we have to evolve in our own way rather than blindly following HBS or stanford. If US have HBS at PG level then it also have MIT at undergraduate level, i mean all of academic culture there is very different and cannot be compared to that of India. U can be of 95% student at kumaon university but surely may not be even 6 pointer at IIT Kanpur. To have different norms than US is not all that bad.
I know many students who barely passed their undergrduate program but did great in their PGDBM, infact even went up to gold medals.
India is very different and will remain different, closing eyes to this reality will not serve any purpose.

morphi
#15 April 27, 2006, 11:30 am

About what 12345 feel is quite obvious considering the fact that he could not make it to IIMC! I would like to advise him to try for HBS or Stanford, if he is so confident of his past academic performances. To have 45% and then getting 99.. something percentile is no mean thing to overlook, if it happen somewhere(though I know 5 pointers of IITs making to IIMs).
People have all kind of problems when doing their undergraduation in India and that can contribute to low scores in degree.

chirantan29
#16 May 17, 2006, 3:40 am

jst one thing to say…this interview wud help a lot.
& 12345 is an ASS

Kalvin
#17 May 21, 2006, 4:20 pm

haa .. there is a sigh of relief now!
now that the shadow of bad acads is not looming overhead prep is gonna be more peaceful.

wat abt the other institues ??

sugz
#18 May 23, 2006, 9:16 am

I am concerned abt the "dearth of teachers" part! When I asked an IIMite as to whether he'd like to join the IIMs as a teacher once he finishes his MBA, his answer was – "WHy should I be bothered? I dont want to waste my life teaching!" . sigh! Something needs to be done about getting quality teachers and retaining them too.

soumya_mty
#19 June 01, 2006, 9:37 am

Thanks a lot for this interview!!! It's really helpful!!! This is an amazing site! I got everything I was looking for!!!

varunspidey
#20 October 13, 2007, 3:32 am

I have just one thing to say to 12345….im studying in vjti in the final year and my cgpa until now is a measly 5.8….needless to say most of the guys in my class have fared better than me in all the subjects in every semester….but we did have presentations on every subject every sem where we had to speak to a class of nearly 60 students strength on a particular topic related to the subject…..i scored higher in almost all of these when compared to the 9 pointers!!!All the nerds could do on the stage was stutter and stammer!!! When they are so good at mugging up and vomitting it out in the exams,i wonder why they couldnt speak on the SAME SUBJECTS on stage……do these guys deserve an iim seat more [forget the cat]??if u cant even communicate then all ure knowledge is for you and thats about it, its of no use to anyone!!!
period.

varunspidey
#21 October 13, 2007, 3:39 am

And one more thing the CAT is designed to test possibly every managerial capability of the applicants be it D.I which tests how quickly a student can grasp a graph or a pie chart and come up with quick solutions to the questions[atleast traditionally],or english which gives an insight into how proficient someone is communication wise,and maths of course i dont need to explain that.
One question i have is,is the 10th board or 12th board exams or even the engineering exams in any way equipped to do the same??In fact the poor farers in these stupid board exams are [in my observation] better with their reasoning then most "merit rankers"!!
Acads is a criteria i dont deny it….but if u start having a 45% weightage for 10th+12th+graduation they way IIM-B then WHY keep the CAT?…..you can tie up with the state boards and request them their top 10 merit rankers for your institute!!

mukg
#22 July 25, 2009, 8:47 am

thanks for such a nice article!! It definitely clears a lot a doubts I used to have about IIM’s.

prateek
#23 August 04, 2009, 11:59 am

fantastic…..iim banglore should scrap weightage on past acads…..think a person getting 60%marks inboards doesn’t mean he hasn’t got mind like a 90% marks hitter…itz just that he does not work hard…..and cat test aptitude first not working hard morons(though i em not saying working hard is bad)….if u have such a good marks try for research!!!! bang on interview….i luv it….

haritude
#24 December 04, 2009, 2:11 pm

a person who gets a 45% may always not be because he was not serious..there are lots of other things that decides a persons acads.. For Indian education a person with more theoretical knowledge can fetch a 80%. But may be at times in practical knowledge he myt be below the 45% guy So it makes lot sense that past acads of person are no indicator of the persons caliber..Come on IIMS n IITs Scrap this criteria make it a level playing ground for all…A Person who dedicates hes whole life and sacrifices a lot for cat must not be let down because he had bad acads!! Every1 makes the same effort to get there…so all should be treated fairly!

abhi0206
#25 January 17, 2010, 11:49 am

A person who got 45% in 10th or 12th or say grad may not seems to hav gud apti or focus but what seems is not always a reality. May be he was just not serious in those years, it happenes with a lot of teenagers who loose focus due to a lot of unnecessary glittering thins, and lost focus. But it, by means, doesn’t mean that he is not capable enough or don’t have enough aptitude to compete with rest of the so called genius crowd. You cant punish a guy whole life for past mistakes. If he is clearing a tough exam like CAT of IIT-JEE then he is showing that he is as capable enough as others.May be there are some student who has poor past record even after trying too hard then believe me it’ll be very difficult for such students to clear CAT or IIT-JEE.SO they’ll not come into this discussion. All those clearing CAT and IIT-JEE and having poor past record were just not serious enough in past. But it doesn’t mean they cant be and they in fact showed that they are clearing tough exams like CAT and IIT JEE. So whoever clearing CAT should be treated on even ground and fairly.

Add Comment

Post comments here

Username

Password

Forgot Password?

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

SPONSORS
S P O N S O R S